TOTAL VOLUME:

$154.4b

24H VOL:

$290,393,159

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,984,640,614

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,944,100,805

420,493

Markets across

40,511

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

4,612

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

37%

VS.

Kalshi:

63%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
API
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Elections
Crypto
Companies
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Akave Esports Black vs MIBR GC
opinion

What is the result of Akave Esports Black vs MIBR GC?

Volume:
$0

Akave Esports Black vs MIBR GC

 - Opinion

Akave Esports Black vs MIBR GC - Opinion

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 15, 2026

Closed: Oct 15, 2:47 AM EST

opinion

Opinion

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
opinion

Akave Esports Black vs MIBR GC

View
N/A
N/A
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 1

Description

In the upcoming VCT best-of-series match scheduled for 2026-10-14 23:00 UTC: if MIBR GC wins the series, the market will resolve to "MIBR GC"; if Akave Esports Black wins the series, the market will resolve to "Akave Esports Black". The series winner is the first team to win a majority of games. Individual games remade due to technical issues do not count as wins toward the series. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. In cases where a team's listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50. Resolution Source: official VCT broadcast and https://valorantesports.com/; community coverage on vlr.gg may be used as a supplementary source. Note: Opinion will resolve strictly based on the first officially published result from the designated source. Any subsequent revisions will not affect this resolution.

Opinion

In the upcoming VCT best-of-series match scheduled for 2026-10-14 23:00 UTC: if MIBR GC wins the series, the market will resolve to "MIBR GC"; if Akave Esports Black wins the series, the market will resolve to "Akave Esports Black". The series winner is the first team to win a majority of games. Individual games remade due to technical issues do not count as wins toward the series. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. In cases where a team's listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50. Resolution Source: official VCT broadcast and https://valorantesports.com/; community coverage on vlr.gg may be used as a supplementary source. Note: Opinion will resolve strictly based on the first officially published result from the designated source. Any subsequent revisions will not affect this resolution.

Frequently asked questions

On Opinion, the dashboard for the Akave Esports vs MIBR match tracks the current odds, price history, and 24-hour trading volume. Currently, the total volume for this market is $0, with $0 traded in the last 24 hours. Users can view how the implied probability of each outcome has changed over time, giving insight into where the crowd currently believes the most likely result lies. This information is updated in real-time as traders buy and sell contracts, reflecting the collective wisdom of the market.

Comparing prediction market odds to analyst forecasts reveals interesting insights into collective versus expert opinion. Often, this market demonstrates a different perspective than traditional sports analysts, potentially incorporating factors that analysts may overlook. While analysts might favor one team based on recent performance or player statistics, the prediction market aggregates the views of many individuals, creating a potentially more well-rounded assessment of the likely outcome. It’s a fascinating way to see how the ‘wisdom of the crowd’ stacks up against expert predictions for the Akave Esports vs MIBR match.

On Opinion, this market is priced through a continuous auction mechanism where traders buy and sell contracts representing their belief in the probability of each outcome. The price of a contract reflects the market's current assessment of that outcome's likelihood. On Opinion, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. Price fluctuations are driven by supply and demand; if more traders believe Akave Esports Black will win, the price of contracts representing that outcome will increase. Conversely, increased trading volume favoring MIBR GC will drive down the price of contracts predicting their victory. This dynamic pricing ensures the market reflects the most up-to-date information and collective intelligence.

This market resolves around Oct 14, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. Resolution will be based on the official result of the Akave Esports Black vs MIBR GC match, as reported by the governing body or official tournament organizers. The platform will verify the outcome against publicly available sources to ensure accuracy and transparency. Traders holding winning contracts will be paid out according to the final market prices at resolution, while those holding losing contracts will forfeit their stake.

Several signals or events could significantly move this market before Oct 14, 2026. Unexpected roster changes for either Akave Esports Black or MIBR GC, such as a key player becoming unavailable, would likely cause shifts in the odds. News regarding team practice performance, strategic adjustments, or even changes in the game’s meta could also influence trader sentiment. Finally, any significant public statements from team members or analysts expressing strong opinions about the match’s likely outcome could trigger increased trading activity and price fluctuations in this market.