TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$134,145,987

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,441,166,947

406,422

Markets across

30,383

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,688

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Will the Supreme Court let Trump fire FTC Commissioners at will?
kalshi

Will the Supreme Court let Trump fire FTC Commissioners at will?

Volume:
$58,264

Yes

 - Kalshi

Yes - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 29, 2026

Closed: Jun 29, 10:34 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Yes

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$58,264
N/A
N/A
$30,447
10mo 5d
Yes
Total markets: 1

Intro

This market tracks whether the Supreme Court will rule in favor of Trump in Trump v. Slaughter, potentially overturning the Humphrey's Executor precedent that currently restricts presidential removal of FTC Commissioners. On Kalshi, the leading outcome—a Supreme Court ruling in Trump's favor—stands at 93.9%. Resolution depends on the Court's decision in Trump v. Slaughter as the basis for overturning Humphrey's Executor v. United States. Watch for the Supreme Court's formal ruling in this case, expected by the August 2027 resolution date, which will determine whether presidents gain expanded power to remove independent agency heads.

Kalshi

If the Supreme Court, in Trump v. Slaughter, rules to overturn Humphrey's Executor v. United States, then the market resolves to Yes.

Frequently asked questions

The market is scheduled to resolve by Aug 1, 2027. Resolution hinges on the Supreme Court's final decision in Trump v. Slaughter regarding whether the President may remove FTC Commissioners without cause. The outcome is determined solely by the Court's ruling on the constitutional question of presidential removal authority over independent agency heads. Once the decision is issued and becomes final, the contract settles according to whether the Court's holding aligns with the affirmative or negative resolution criteria established at market inception.

Key catalysts include oral argument dates and transcripts, which reveal judicial questioning and skepticism toward either side's constitutional theory. Amicus curiae briefs from executive-branch officials, administrative law scholars, and business groups can shift market sentiment. Published opinions from lower courts or related cases addressing removal power may provide interpretive guidance. Media coverage of the case and legal commentary analyzing the justices' likely positions also influence trader expectations. Finally, any statements or actions by Trump, the FTC, or Congress regarding removal authority could reshape market pricing as the resolution date approaches.