TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$113,466,932

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,423,222,590

402,751

Markets across

30,217

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,632

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Companies
Which company has the best AI model end of June?
opinion

Which company has the best AI model end of June?

Volume:
$7,611,553

Alibaba

 - Opinion

Alibaba - Opinion

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 1, 2026

Closed: Jul 1, 6:12 AM EST

opinion

Opinion

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
opinion

Alibaba

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,113,805
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 1

Description

This market will resolve according to the company which owns the model which has the highest arena score based off the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard (https://lmarena.ai/) when the table under the "Leaderboard" tab is checked on June 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET. Results from the "Arena Score" section on the Leaderboard tab of https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text with the style control off will be used to resolve this market. If two models are tied for the top arena score at this market's check time, resolution will be based on whichever company's name, as it is described in this market group, comes first in alphabetical order (e.g., if both were tied, "Google" would resolve to "Yes", and "xAI" would resolve to "No") The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.

Opinion

This market will resolve according to the company which owns the model which has the highest arena score based off the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard (https://lmarena.ai/) when the table under the "Leaderboard" tab is checked on June 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET. Results from the "Arena Score" section on the Leaderboard tab of https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text with the style control off will be used to resolve this market. If two models are tied for the top arena score at this market's check time, resolution will be based on whichever company's name, as it is described in this market group, comes first in alphabetical order (e.g., if both were tied, "Google" would resolve to "Yes", and "xAI" would resolve to "No") The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.

Frequently asked questions

On Opinion, the dashboard for the best AI model race displays real-time odds and historical price movements as traders wager on which company will field the leading artificial intelligence model by the end of June. The interface shows current market sentiment through live pricing, 24-hour trading volume, and cumulative liquidity across all outcomes. This market has attracted significant participation, reflecting broad interest in tracking competitive developments among major AI developers. Traders can monitor shifts in implied probability as new model releases, benchmark results, or capability announcements emerge throughout the prediction window.

Prediction market odds often diverge from traditional analyst forecasts because they aggregate real-money bets from thousands of participants with direct financial incentives to forecast accurately. While research firms and industry analysts may publish quarterly reports on AI capability rankings, this market reflects live consensus from traders responding immediately to product launches, performance metrics, and competitive announcements. The continuous repricing mechanism typically captures emerging signals faster than periodic analyst updates, though both sources can inform a complete view of the competitive landscape.

On Opinion, this market is priced through an automated market maker that converts trader bets into real-time odds for each company outcome. On Opinion, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. Traders buy and sell shares representing each potential winner, and the price of each share reflects the collective assessment of that outcome's likelihood. As new information surfaces—such as model benchmarks, feature announcements, or competitive moves—the price adjusts dynamically. Higher trading volume typically narrows spreads and improves price discovery, allowing participants to enter and exit positions with greater precision.

This market resolves around Jun 30, 2026, at which point the outcome is confirmed based on credible public reporting and verifiable evidence of which company's AI model is recognized as the best. The resolution hinges on documented benchmarks, industry assessments, and widely acknowledged performance metrics available by that date. Once the event is verifiable from authoritative sources, the market settles and winning positions are paid out accordingly. Traders should monitor major AI releases and capability announcements in the months leading up to resolution.

Major catalysts include new model releases from leading AI companies, published benchmark results on standardized tests, real-world performance comparisons, and announcements of significant capabilities or breakthroughs. Regulatory developments, partnership announcements, or shifts in enterprise adoption could also influence trader sentiment. Media coverage of AI safety, alignment, or deployment success stories may sway perception of which model is genuinely the strongest. Technical papers, conference presentations, and head-to-head evaluations by independent researchers are likely to trigger repricing as the market absorbs fresh evidence about relative performance and leadership.