TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$130,522,377
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,438,389,636
404,028
Markets across
30,214
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,681
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: May 28, 5:55 PM EST
Kalshi
This event tracks whether a United States representative will mention specific geopolitical topics—including key figures like Trump or Putin, regional concerns like Ukraine's capital Kyiv, military matters such as drones or nuclear weapons, international alliances like NATO, or other relevant nations and regions—during a Security Council discussion on maintaining peace and security in Ukraine. The market also resolves positively if no qualifying Security Council meeting occurs during the specified timeframe.
Prediction market odds on Kalshi reflect real-time trader conviction and are often more dynamic than traditional analyst forecasts. While analysts may issue periodic statements on US diplomatic positioning at the UN, prediction markets aggregate continuous information flow and trader expectations into live probabilities. This event's market pricing incorporates geopolitical developments, diplomatic signals, and historical precedent faster than static analyst reports, offering a complementary view to expert commentary on US Security Council rhetoric.
This market resolves on May 29, 2026. Resolution is determined by statements actually made by US representatives during UN Security Council proceedings within the event window. The outcome hinges on whether the representative's remarks match the specific criteria outlined in the market's outcome definitions, capturing the substance and context of US diplomatic communication on peace and security issues discussed in the Council.
Key catalysts include escalations or de-escalations in Ukraine conflict dynamics, shifts in US foreign policy priorities, statements from other Security Council members, and scheduled UN sessions addressing regional security. Diplomatic cables, White House statements, and statements from the State Department can signal how the US representative may frame their remarks. Changes in international crises, sanctions announcements, or peace negotiations would also influence trader expectations about the tone and content of US Security Council statements.