TOTAL VOLUME:
$116.3b
24H VOL:
$96,585,732
24H TRANSACTIONS:
1,361,103,189
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,159,020,457
329,092
Markets across
32,581
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
3,748
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
42%
VS.
Kalshi:
58%
China x Philippines military clash before 2027?
- Polymarket
China x Philippines military clash before 2027? - Polymarket
33%
1W
News
Positive
Negative
Neutral
Hover marker for details
Aug 18
Aug 19
Aug 20
Aug 21
Aug 23
Aug 24
Aug 25
Vol.
$198.2k
·
Resolves Dec 31, 2026
$
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of China (People's Republic of China) and Philippines between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as melee weapons, missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between Chinese and Philippine military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not. Note: the China Coast Guard (CCG) is part of the military, however, Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) is not. The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of China (People's Republic of China) and Philippines between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as melee weapons, missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between Chinese and Philippine military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not. Note: the China Coast Guard (CCG) is part of the military, however, Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) is not. The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Currently, this market suggests a 32.5% probability of a military clash occurring before 2027. This contrasts with many analyst forecasts, which often present a more nuanced view based on diplomatic engagement and regional stability efforts. Analysts may highlight ongoing talks, economic interdependencies, or historical precedents that could deter direct conflict. Traders, however, are pricing in immediate risk signals and perceived escalation trends, which can diverge from longer-term strategic assessments.
On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. On Polymarket, traders actively set the odds through buying and selling contracts that represent either a clash happening or not happening before the deadline. The current top outcome reflects 32.5% chance of an event, derived from the collective bets of participants. Market depth and liquidity, represented by a volume of $352,096, help determine price stability and responsiveness to new information.
This market resolves around Dec 31, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. If any confirmed military engagement between China and the Philippines occurs before that date, the 'yes' outcome settles. Otherwise, the 'no' outcome is selected. The resolution depends on authoritative news sources and official reports that confirm whether an armed clash took place.
Several geopolitical signals could shift this market. Increased naval patrols, inflammatory statements from political leaders, or border incidents might raise perceived risk and lift the probability of conflict. Conversely, diplomatic breakthroughs, joint statements, or confidence-building measures could lower tensions and push odds toward the 'no' outcome. Regional alliances, economic pressures, and international mediation efforts also play key roles in shaping trader expectations before Dec 31, 2026.