TOTAL VOLUME:
$143b
24H VOL:
$111,424,783
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,661,467,257
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,630,632,565
494,234
Markets across
37,330
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,871
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
38%
VS.
Kalshi:
62%
Kalshi is available in Texas and no state or court order blocks it. But lawmakers are studying it, and the federal court fight over sports contracts isn't over.
Jared Polites
Oct 16, 2026

TL;DR
Heard that Texas has some of the strictest gambling laws in the country and wondering how Kalshi fits in? You're asking the right question, because the honest answer has two layers. Kalshi is open to Texans right now, and nobody has stopped it. But the legal fight underneath that, about whether sports contracts are federally regulated trades or state-regulated bets, hasn't been settled, and Texas lawmakers are watching it closely.
This isn't legal advice, and the fastest-moving parts of this story deserve a fresh check if you're reading this more than a few weeks after publication.
Yes, as of this writing. Kalshi is a Designated Contract Market regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the same category of federal designation that covers major derivatives exchanges. Texas residents can complete identity verification, fund an account, and trade on it.
Texas doesn't license Kalshi the way it would a sportsbook, because Kalshi doesn't operate as one. It operates as a federally regulated exchange, and its contracts are structured as event-based derivatives. A Yes contract pays $1 if the event happens and $0 if it doesn't.
No Texas court order restricts Texas residents from using it, and the state has not banned it. That's the current status, and it's worth knowing exactly how fragile or solid it is, which the rest of this piece covers.
Texas has long been one of the tougher gambling states. Online sports betting is illegal there, and efforts to legalize it have failed repeatedly, most recently in the 2023 and 2025 legislative sessions, according to the Texas Tribune. Texas Penal Code chapter 47, which covers gambling offenses, also makes election betting illegal, a point opponents of prediction markets have raised.
Kalshi's answer is federal preemption. Its position is that the Commodity Exchange Act gives the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over contracts traded on a federally designated exchange, which would leave states without the power to apply their gambling laws to them. Kalshi's spokesperson described the company as "regulated at the federal level" and on "firm legal ground."
That argument is real and has won in some courts. It is also being contested in others, which is why it can't be treated as settled law. Our guide to prediction market regulation walks through the underlying federal and state split in more depth.
Not so far, based on what's publicly reported. The Texas Tribune reported in May 2026 that it found no Texas attorney general lawsuit or enforcement action against prediction markets. Attorney General Ken Paxton's office did not say whether state gambling laws apply to them.
Texas also hasn't joined the multistate efforts that other attorneys general have. Paxton's office didn't respond to requests in March 2026 to join a brief arguing the CFTC lacks sole authority, a brief 39 states signed. It was also one of 12 attorneys general who didn't sign a June 2026 brief backing Ohio's enforcement against Kalshi, according to Politico.
None of that is a legal guarantee. It's an enforcement posture, and postures can change. Fifteen states had sued, investigated, or sent cease-and-desist orders to prediction market operators as of the Tribune's reporting.
This is the part most likely to matter over the next year. In March 2026, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick added prediction markets to the Texas Senate's interim priorities under the label "Closing Gambling Loopholes." The charge asks the Senate State Affairs Committee to study how federally regulated derivative markets relate to gambling Texas prohibits, and to make recommendations ahead of the 2027 legislative session.
A Texas Senate committee has also questioned Kalshi's head of enforcement, Robert DeNault, at a hearing. It ended without an official decision.
Texas's legislature meets in regular session only every two years, so the 2027 session is the realistic window for any new state law. Any state restriction would also face the same federal preemption question Kalshi is litigating elsewhere, which is why the court cases below matter for Texas even though none of them are Texas cases.
The core question in nearly every case is whether Kalshi's sports event contracts are "swaps" under the Commodity Exchange Act. If they are, federal law likely preempts state gambling rules. If they aren't, states can apply their own laws. Appeals courts have now answered both ways.
| Court | State | Date | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Third Circuit | New Jersey | April 6, 2026 | 2-1 for Kalshi; sports contracts treated as swaps under CFTC jurisdiction |
| Ninth Circuit | Nevada | August 28, 2026 | 3-0 against Kalshi; rehearing petition filed September 9 |
| Sixth Circuit | Ohio and Tennessee | September 25, 2026 | 3-0 against Kalshi; rehearing petition filed October 9 |
| Fourth Circuit | Maryland | Argued May 7, 2026 | No decision reported as of October 16, 2026 |
Texas sits in the Fifth Circuit, which hasn't ruled on Kalshi. The Texas Tribune noted in May that none of the pending cases were before it, and no Fifth Circuit Kalshi ruling turned up in research for this piece. Rulings from other circuits don't bind Texas courts, though judges often find them persuasive.
Kalshi itself has said it isn't looking for a fight with states and is working to educate officials. The company has also complied with court orders restricting certain sports markets in specific states, which is the normal way a regulated company handles an adverse ruling.
For a state-by-state look at how a different case turned out, see our breakdown of Kalshi in California.
Possibly, and both are moving. Several parties have asked the Supreme Court to resolve the split, including New Jersey (No. 26-299), Robinhood, and reportedly Crypto.com's exchange. No petition has been granted. Kalshi's response to the New Jersey petition is due November 9, 2026.
The CFTC also acted on October 9, 2026. As reported, it issued an interim rule stating that state- or tribally licensed casino-style products, including sportsbook wagers, are not swaps. It also proposed a rule that would add event contracts on sports, politics, culture, and weather to the federal definition of a swap.
Kalshi cited those actions the same day in its Sixth Circuit rehearing petition. Coverage of the two actions differs on some details, so treat the specifics as developing until the Federal Register text and final rules are in.
Yes. The legal pressure in Texas, as everywhere, concentrates on sports. A contract on the economy, the weather, or an entertainment event looks less like a wager under a state gambling statute than a contract on a game does.
Election contracts are the one non-sports category with a specific Texas hook, because of Penal Code chapter 47's election-betting provision that opponents have cited.
The practical weight of this is larger than it sounds. Artemis data cited by the Texas Tribune puts sports contracts at 80% to 90% of Kalshi's monthly volume. A ruling that narrowed sports contracts would touch most of what Kalshi's users actually trade, even if non-sports markets stayed untouched.
Texans comparing prediction markets are really comparing regulatory structures, because that's what determines how each platform fits in a state like Texas. The platforms PredictionHero tracks differ sharply:
| Platform | Regulatory structure | Identity verification | Funding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | CFTC-regulated Designated Contract Market | Required before funding | Bank transfer, debit card, crypto deposits |
| Polymarket (international) | Crypto-native platform outside the CFTC framework | Not required for basic access | Crypto wallet |
| Polymarket US | Separate CFTC-regulated exchange | Required before funding | Funded after ID verification |
| Limitless | On-chain exchange | Wallet connection | Crypto wallet |
| Predict.Fun | On-chain exchange on BNB Chain | Wallet connection | Crypto wallet |
| Opinion | On-chain exchange, macro-focused | Wallet connection | Crypto wallet |
Access for the on-chain platforms varies by jurisdiction and by each platform's own terms, so check those before connecting a wallet. Our KYC requirements guide covers the verification differences in detail.
Kalshi is the only one of these built from inception as a CFTC-regulated exchange with direct bank funding, which is why the "is it legal in my state" question attaches to it more than the others. PredictionHero's tracked data puts Kalshi at 61% of the $140.9 billion in volume across all five platforms as of October 2026.
FanDuel and DraftKings have also launched prediction market products that the Texas Tribune reported are available to Texans, so the choice isn't only between crypto-native and exchange-based venues. Our US-regulated exchanges roundup tracks which platforms operate inside the US regulatory perimeter.
There are no legal commercial casinos or sportsbooks in Texas, so the comparison is mostly to offshore and out-of-state books. The structural difference is who sets the price.
On a sportsbook, the house sets the line and takes the other side of your bet. On Kalshi, other traders set the price on an exchange, and Kalshi earns fees rather than winning when you lose. Our prediction markets vs. sportsbooks guide covers that difference. It's the core of Kalshi's legal argument that its contracts are financial instruments, not wagers.
Whether courts and legislatures agree for sports contracts specifically is exactly what's being decided.
Opening a Kalshi account from Texas works the same as anywhere else in the US: identity verification, a funding source, and access to the listed contracts. Before you fund an account, check Kalshi's own terms of service and any jurisdiction notices it posts, since availability for specific contract types can change when a court rules.
It also helps to separate what's settled from what isn't. That Kalshi is available in Texas today is a fact. Whether Texas will act in 2027, and whether the Supreme Court or the CFTC resolves the sports-contract split first, are open questions.
If you do trade, comparing prices for the same event across venues is straightforward on PredictionHero's dashboard, which normalizes odds across Kalshi, Polymarket, Limitless, Predict.Fun, and Opinion side by side. Our Kalshi review covers whether the platform itself holds up beyond the legal question.
Yes. Kalshi is available to Texas residents as a CFTC-regulated exchange. No Texas law, lawsuit, attorney general action, or court order currently blocks it.
No. Reporting through mid-2026 found no Texas attorney general lawsuit or enforcement action against Kalshi or other prediction markets, and Texas has not joined the multistate briefs other states have filed on the issue.
Kalshi argues it is a federally regulated derivatives exchange, not a sportsbook, and that federal law preempts state gambling rules for contracts traded on it. Courts are split on whether that applies to sports contracts, so the question isn't settled.
It's possible. The Texas Senate has been directed to study prediction markets ahead of the 2027 legislative session, and court rulings on sports contracts in other states could shape what Texas is able to do.
Yes. Most of the litigation targets sports event contracts specifically, while markets on topics like the economy, weather, and entertainment face much less legal pressure.
Kalshi is a CFTC-regulated exchange with identity verification and bank funding. Polymarket runs an international crypto-based platform and a separate, CFTC-regulated Polymarket US exchange that requires verification, so the answer depends on which one you mean.
This article is for informational purposes only and is not legal or financial advice. PredictionHero aggregates publicly available prediction market data. Prediction markets may not be available in all jurisdictions, and legal status can change; verify current status before relying on it, especially while court cases and rulemakings are ongoing.
Related

Kalshi hasn't been banned in California, and most of its contracts face no state challenge at all. Here's the actual status, not the simplified version.
Jared Polites · Oct 14

Prediction markets are legal for contracts structured as CFTC-regulated event contracts but the question is open for sports-outcome contracts according to state gambling law.
Jared Polites · Aug 10

IBKR, Robinhood, Gemini, DraftKings, and FanDuel all built or bought regulated exchanges of their own this year, while federal courts split on whether any of it preempts state law.
Jared Polites · Sep 13