TOTAL VOLUME:

$154.3b

24H VOL:

$219,029,434

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,984,028,936

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,869,293,526

411,051

Markets across

40,408

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

4,377

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

37%

VS.

Kalshi:

63%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Politics
Will Trump publicly insult someone on...?
polymarket

Will Trump insult someone on November 1, 2026?

Volume:
$74,033

October 26

 - Polymarket

October 26 - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 31, 2026

Closed: Oct 26, 9:19 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

October 26

View
100%
2%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$8,016
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 24

100%
3%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$6,761
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 31

100%
4%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$4,960
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 18

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$4,297
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 25

100%
2%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$3,784
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 30

100%
1%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$3,059
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 10

100%
2%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$2,896
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 27

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$2,655
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 12

100%
3%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$2,567
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 9

100%
5%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$2,466
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 11

100%
4%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$2,387
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 14

100%
3%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$2,372
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 5

100%
5%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$2,190
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 3

100%
50%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$2,182
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 23

100%
2%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$2,148
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 16

100%
3%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$2,133
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 28

100%
4%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$2,030
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 2

100%
19%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$1,965
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 21

100%
4%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$1,685
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 13

100%
2%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$1,627
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 15

100%
10%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$1,590
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 22

100%
3%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$1,419
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 6

100%
35%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$1,315
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 17

100%
3%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$1,302
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

October 19

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$1,265
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 25 of 30

Description

This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A qualifying public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available on the specified date (ET). Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify. Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify. A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify. A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare"). A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.

Polymarket

This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A qualifying public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available on the specified date (ET). Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify. Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify. A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify. A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare"). A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.

Frequently asked questions

Currently, prediction market odds offer a distinct perspective compared to traditional polling data regarding the likelihood of this event. While polls capture stated opinions, this market reflects what individuals are willing to *wager* on, potentially revealing stronger convictions. Discrepancies can arise from factors like motivated reasoning or the desire to avoid expressing controversial opinions in polls. It is important to note that this market represents a different form of data point, focused on incentivized prediction rather than reported sentiment.

On Polymarket, this market is priced through a continuous trading mechanism where participants buy and sell shares representing their belief in the outcome. The price of a share directly corresponds to the probability of the event occurring, as perceived by the collective wisdom of the traders. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The more traders believe Trump will issue an insult, the higher the share price will climb, and vice-versa. This dynamic pricing ensures the market reflects the latest information and sentiment surrounding this topic.

This market resolves around Nov 1, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. Resolution will depend on whether Donald Trump publicly insults a named individual before the resolution date. The definition of a 'public insult' will be determined by the platform's guidelines, focusing on direct, disparaging remarks made through widely accessible channels. The outcome will be based on documented statements and not interpretations of intent or indirect comments.