TOTAL VOLUME:

$154.7b

24H VOL:

$279,496,801

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,984,640,614

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,923,931,766

416,910

Markets across

40,107

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

4,571

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

37%

VS.

Kalshi:

63%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Politics
Who will Trump publicly insult by August 31?
polymarket

Who will Trump publicly insult by August 31?

Volume:
$72,657

Marjorie Taylor Greene

 - Polymarket

Marjorie Taylor Greene - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 12, 2026

Closed: Aug 22, 12:41 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Marjorie Taylor Greene

View
100%
59%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$9,269
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Nicolás Maduro

100%
2%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$3,554
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Tucker Carlson

100%
65%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$2,970
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Joe Biden

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$2,725
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Barack Obama

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$2,489
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Candace Owens

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$11,665
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Alex Jones

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5,759
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Melania Trump

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$3,768
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Friedrich Merz

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$3,110
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Pope Leo XIV

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$2,924
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Vladimir Putin

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$2,869
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Jerome Powell

0%
1%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$2,636
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Megyn Kelly

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$2,222
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Norah O'Donnell

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$2,158
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Andy Burnham

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$2,035
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Elon Musk

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,999
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Emmanuel Macron

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,906
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Xi Jinping

0%
2%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,454
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Zohran Mamdani

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,300
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Kaitlan Collins

0%
31%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,295
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Kevin Warsh

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$959
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

J.D. Vance

0%
2%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$913
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Mohammed bin Salman

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$898
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Benjamin Netanyahu

0%
1%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$746
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Pam Bondi

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$483
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 25 of 27

Description

This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify. Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify. A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare"). A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.

Polymarket

This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify. Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify. A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare"). A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket, this dashboard tracks the latest odds and price history for the Trump public insult market, along with a live view of 24-hour volume of $239. It shows how traders on Polymarket are pricing the likelihood of Donald Trump issuing a public insult before the deadline, updated in real time.

Compared to public polling averages, this market often reflects a more aggressive timeline or higher confidence in an insult occurring. While polls may show general public sentiment toward Trump’s behavior, the market incorporates real-time news cycles, social media trends, and geopolitical tensions that could prompt an outburst anytime before Sep 1, 2026.

On Polymarket, traders currently set the odds through continuous bidding, reflecting their collective expectations about who Donald Trump might publicly insult by August 31, 2026. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The top outcome shows a strong likelihood of one specific individual being targeted, with the market price adjusting dynamically based on new political developments, media coverage, and Trump’s own public statements. Volume of $239 over the last 24 hours indicates active participation, while the overall volume of $72,657 demonstrates sustained interest in the the Trump public insult market as the deadline approaches.

This market resolves around Sep 1, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. Any widely reported statement, social media post, or official address by Donald Trump that constitutes a direct, public insult to another individual will trigger a settlement, based on transparent public records.

Several signals could shift this market before it resolves on Sep 1, 2026. Any high-profile public remarks by Donald Trump — especially during rallies, interviews, or on social media — naming a specific individual would likely cause rapid price adjustments. Additionally, major news events involving potential targets, such as scandals or diplomatic incidents, might increase their chances in the market. Conversely, if Trump avoids direct insults or focuses his rhetoric elsewhere, odds could shift toward “No Insult” or alternative targets. Continuous monitoring of Trump’s public appearances and media coverage will be key to tracking market movements.