TOTAL VOLUME:
$154.8b
24H VOL:
$277,138,640
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,984,640,614
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,905,404,943
412,077
Markets across
39,838
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
4,526
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
37%
VS.
Kalshi:
63%
Closed: Oct 25, 10:44 PM EST
Polymarket
This group forecasts the winner of the 2026 Rio Grande do Norte gubernatorial election in Brazil. The election is scheduled for October 4, 2026, with a potential runoff on October 25, 2026, if no candidate achieves a majority in the first round. Resolution will be based on official results from the Brazilian Superior Electoral Court (TSE).
The Rio Grande do Norte gubernatorial election is scheduled to take place in Brazil on October 4, 2026, with a runoff on October 25, 2026, if no candidate receives a majority of the valid votes in the first round. This market will resolve according to the candidate who wins this election. Temporary, interim, or placeholder governors appointed by any means before the specified election will not be considered. If the result of this election isn't known by June 30, 2027, 11:59 PM ET, the market will resolve to "Other". This market will resolve based on the result of the election, as indicated by a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve based solely on the official results as reported by the Brazilian government, specifically the Superior Electoral Court (Tribunal Superior Eleitoral, TSE) (e.g., www.tse.jus.br/eleicoes/resultados-eleicoes).
All markets resolve to Yes if the associated candidate is declared the winner of the 2026 Rio Grande do Norte gubernatorial election. Early resolution is permitted once recognized media outlets collectively identify a winner, otherwise markets settle based on formal election certifications.
Prediction market odds often offer a different perspective than traditional polling averages. While polls capture stated preferences, this market reflects what people are willing to *bet* on, which can be a more accurate signal of actual expectations. Polling averages can be susceptible to biases, such as sampling errors or strategic misreporting, whereas the financial incentive in this market encourages participants to express their true beliefs. However, both sources of information can be valuable, and discrepancies may indicate areas where further investigation is warranted. It's important to consider both when forming an informed opinion.