TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$143,246,370
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,403,290,006
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,452,035,386
405,032
Markets across
30,543
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,690
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jun 27, 1:34 PM EST
Kalshi
This event group tracks the outcome of a UFC Fight Night flyweight main card bout between Asu Almabayev and Charles Johnson scheduled for June 27, 2026. The aggregated consensus across Polymarket and Kalshi shows 100.0% probability for the event occurring as scheduled. Markets span fight outcome, method of victory, round duration, and distance completion, with resolution determined by official UFC records at ufc.com/events. Watch for any official UFC announcements regarding fighter availability or bout card changes prior to the June 27 fight date.
This market will resolve to "Asu Almabayev" if Asu Almabayev is officially declared the winner of the fight against Charles Johnson at UFC Fight Night: Fiziev vs. Torres, scheduled for June 27, 2026. It will resolve to "Charles Johnson" if Charles Johnson is officially declared the winner. If the fight is declared a draw or technical draw, ruled a No Contest, not scored, canceled, or postponed beyond July 11, 2026, this market will resolve "50-50." The resolution source for this market will be official information from the UFC.
This market covers the professional MMA fight between Asu Almabayev and Charles Johnson originally scheduled for June 27, 2026. Resolution depends on the fight's official outcome: if Almabayev wins, that market resolves to Yes; if Johnson wins, that market resolves to Yes. If the fight is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled fight concludes within two weeks. In the event of a tie or no contest, both fighter markets resolve to 50/50. Should the fight be cancelled or rescheduled more than two weeks away, the market resolves to a fair price in accordance with established rules.
Polymarket and Kalshi may show different prices due to variations in user base, liquidity depth, and market structure. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts traders with different risk appetites and information sets, so prices can lag or lead depending on which venue processes new information faster. Lower liquidity on one platform can also amplify price swings. Monitoring both venues helps identify arbitrage opportunities and reveals which market segment is more confident in a particular outcome.
Fighter injuries, training camp updates, and official weigh-in results typically drive significant price moves in combat sports markets. News about either competitor's recent performance, coaching changes, or public statements can shift trader conviction. Betting line movements at major sportsbooks often precede prediction market repricing, so monitoring external odds provides an early signal. Social media sentiment, analyst commentary, and any last-minute fight card changes can also trigger volatility. Close attention to MMA news outlets in the days leading up to the bout often reveals catalysts before they fully price in.