TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$129,159,707

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,442,132,418

404,744

Markets across

30,489

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,691

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Alexis Galarneau vs Oliver Tarvet: Set 1 Winner
kalshi

Alexis Galarneau vs Oliver Tarvet: Set 1 Winner

Volume:
$9,043

Oliver Tarvet

 - Kalshi

Oliver Tarvet - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 24, 2026

Closed: Jun 24, 8:52 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Oliver Tarvet

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$8,178
N/A
N/A
$7,492
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Alexis Galarneau

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$865
N/A
N/A
$604
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

This market tracks the outcome of the first set in the professional tennis match between Alexis Galarneau and Oliver Tarvet at the 2026 Wimbledon Men's Singles Qualification Final on June 24. The winner of set 1 will determine the market resolution.

Kalshi

The market resolves to Yes if either Alexis Galarneau or Oliver Tarvet wins set 1 of their professional tennis match in the 2026 Wimbledon Men Singles Qualification Final. If the match does not occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation, the market resolves to a fair price. If the match is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled match concludes within two weeks. If a player retires, markets that can be unconditionally settled based on completed play resolve accordingly; those that cannot are resolved to Fair Market Price at the Exchange's discretion.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the Galarneau vs Tarvet Set 1 winner market dashboard displays real-time odds and historical price movements for this tennis matchup. Traders use the platform to buy and sell shares reflecting their conviction about who will win the opening set. The dashboard shows current bid-ask spreads, cumulative trading volume, and a price chart tracking how market sentiment has shifted over time. This data helps participants monitor liquidity and identify entry or exit points as new information emerges about player form, conditions, or match developments.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and manage risk, while prediction markets aggregate the beliefs of traders risking real capital on outcomes. In this market, traders may price in nuanced factors—recent performance, head-to-head history, or court conditions—faster than traditional oddsmakers adjust their lines. Comparing the two can reveal where one venue undervalues or overvalues a player's chances, though both should be treated as independent estimates rather than ground truth.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through a continuous order book where traders submit bids and asks for shares tied to each outcome. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each share reflects the collective confidence of the market in that player winning Set 1, ranging from near-zero to near-100 cents. As new trades execute, the price updates in real time. Traders can enter or exit positions at any time before the market closes, and the final price at resolution determines payouts—typically 100 cents for the winning outcome and zero for the loser.

This market resolves around Jun 24, 2026, once the first set of the Galarneau vs Tarvet match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public reporting. The outcome is determined by which player wins the set according to official match records. No further conditions or disputes typically affect resolution in straightforward sports markets of this type. Traders should monitor the match schedule and any postponements or format changes that might affect the timing or validity of the event.

Several factors may shift trader sentiment before resolution. Recent performance updates, injury reports, or withdrawal announcements involving either player can trigger sharp price moves. Court surface, weather conditions, and tournament stage may also influence expectations about Set 1 dynamics. Head-to-head history and pre-match commentary from analysts can sway perception of each player's advantage. As match day approaches, any changes to seeding, scheduling, or player form will likely drive trading activity. Once play begins, real-time set developments—break points, momentum shifts, and tactical adjustments—will continuously reprice this market.