TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$113,466,932

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,423,222,590

402,751

Markets across

30,217

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,632

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Yibing Wu vs Novak Djokovic: Game Spread
kalshi

What is the game spread between Yibing Wu and Novak Djokovic?

Volume:
$36,126

Novak Djokovic -7.5 games

 - Kalshi

Novak Djokovic -7.5 games - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 29, 2026

Closed: Jun 29, 5:27 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Novak Djokovic -7.5 games

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$21,043
N/A
N/A
$15,931
Settled
No
kalshi

Novak Djokovic -4.5 games

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$15,083
N/A
N/A
$10,089
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

This market measures the game differential between Yibing Wu and Novak Djokovic in their professional tennis match at the 2026 Wimbledon Men's Singles Round of 128 on June 29. Bettors predict whether Novak Djokovic will win by more than specified game margins, reflecting expectations about the match's competitiveness.

Kalshi

Resolution is based on the game differential in favor of Novak Djokovic across the full match at the 2026 Wimbledon Men's Singles Round of 128. If the match does not occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation, the market resolves to fair price. If postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled match concludes within two weeks. If a player retires, markets that can be unconditionally settled based on completed play resolve accordingly; those that cannot are settled at Fair Market Price at the Exchange's discretion.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the Wu vs Djokovic game spread market dashboard tracks real-time odds and historical price movements for this tennis matchup. The interface displays current market pricing, 24-hour trading volume, and order book depth, allowing traders to monitor how sentiment shifts as the event approaches. This dashboard gives you a live window into how prediction market participants are pricing the point spread between these two players, updated continuously throughout the trading day.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets aggregate trader beliefs through continuous price discovery. This market may show different implied probabilities than traditional sportsbooks, especially as new information emerges or as the event date draws closer. Comparing the two can reveal where the broader market sees value relative to professional oddsmakers.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through an order-book mechanism where traders buy and sell contracts based on their belief about the game spread outcome. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each contract reflects the aggregate probability assigned by active traders; as new information surfaces or trading interest shifts, prices adjust in real time. Liquidity and trading volume directly influence how quickly prices respond to news or changing expectations.

This market resolves around Jun 29, 2026, once the Wu vs Djokovic match concludes and the final point spread is verifiable from credible public sources. The outcome is determined by the official game result and the margin of victory, confirmed through established sports reporting channels. Until that time, traders can continue to buy and sell contracts as odds fluctuate based on pre-match analysis, player form, and other relevant developments.

Several factors could shift odds in this market before resolution. Player injury reports or withdrawal announcements would trigger sharp repricing. Recent tournament performance, head-to-head records, and surface conditions may influence trader positioning. Media coverage of either player's form, fitness updates, or coaching changes could also spark volatility. Additionally, betting action from sharp traders or institutional participants often moves prices as the match date approaches, reflecting new information or consensus shifts among market participants.