TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$130,522,377

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,438,389,636

404,028

Markets across

30,214

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,681

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
WTT - Women's Singles: Song-Gyong Pyon vs Sofia Polcanova
polymarket

WTT - Women's Singles: Song-Gyong Pyon vs Sofia Polcanova

Volume:
$175

WTT - Women's Singles: Song-Gyong Pyon vs Sofia Polcanova

 - Polymarket

WTT - Women's Singles: Song-Gyong Pyon vs Sofia Polcanova - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved May 5, 2026

Closed: May 11, 12:30 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

WTT - Women's Singles: Song-Gyong Pyon vs Sofia Polcanova

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$175
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 1

Description

This market refers to the table tennis match between Song-Gyong Pyon and Sofia Polcanova in a WTT event, scheduled for May 4 at 12:30PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Pyon' if Song-Gyong Pyon wins against Sofia Polcanova. This market will resolve to 'Polcanova' if Sofia Polcanova wins against Song-Gyong Pyon. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.