TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$141,541,542

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,440,096,988

406,065

Markets across

30,522

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,692

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
WTT - Women's Singles: Honoka Hashimoto vs Nina Mittelham
polymarket

WTT - Women's Singles: Honoka Hashimoto vs Nina Mittelham

Volume:
$205

WTT - Women's Singles: Honoka Hashimoto vs Nina Mittelham

 - Polymarket

WTT - Women's Singles: Honoka Hashimoto vs Nina Mittelham - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved May 9, 2026

Closed: May 16, 6:30 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

WTT - Women's Singles: Honoka Hashimoto vs Nina Mittelham

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$205
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 1

Description

This market refers to the table tennis match between Honoka Hashimoto and Nina Mittelham in a WTT event, scheduled for May 9 at 6:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Hashimoto' if Honoka Hashimoto wins against Nina Mittelham. This market will resolve to 'Mittelham' if Nina Mittelham wins against Honoka Hashimoto. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.