TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$103,397,351

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,410,176,180

399,592

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,622

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
WTT - Men's Singles: Tomislav Pucar vs Anton Kaellberg
polymarket

WTT - Men's Singles: Tomislav Pucar vs Anton Kaellberg

Volume:
$403

WTT - Men's Singles: Tomislav Pucar vs Anton Kaellberg

 - Polymarket

WTT - Men's Singles: Tomislav Pucar vs Anton Kaellberg - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved May 7, 2026

Closed: May 13, 12:30 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

WTT - Men's Singles: Tomislav Pucar vs Anton Kaellberg

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$403
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 1

Description

This market refers to the table tennis match between Tomislav Pucar and Anton Kaellberg in a WTT event, scheduled for May 6 at 12:30PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Pucar' if Tomislav Pucar wins against Anton Kaellberg. This market will resolve to 'Kaellberg' if Anton Kaellberg wins against Tomislav Pucar. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.