TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
WTT - Men's Singles: Ryoichi Yoshiyama vs Youzheng Huang
polymarket

WTT - Men's Singles: Ryoichi Yoshiyama vs Youzheng Huang

Volume:
$216

WTT - Men's Singles: Ryoichi Yoshiyama vs Youzheng Huang

 - Polymarket

WTT - Men's Singles: Ryoichi Yoshiyama vs Youzheng Huang - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Apr 17, 2026

Closed: Apr 14, 11:00 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

WTT - Men's Singles: Ryoichi Yoshiyama vs Youzheng Huang

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$216
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 1

Description

This market refers to the table tennis match between Ryoichi Yoshiyama and Youzheng Huang in a WTT event, scheduled for April 7 at 11:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Yoshiyama' if Ryoichi Yoshiyama wins against Youzheng Huang. This market will resolve to 'Huang' if Youzheng Huang wins against Ryoichi Yoshiyama. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.