TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
WTT - Men's Singles: Ricardo Walther vs Hugo Calderano
polymarket

WTT - Men's Singles: Ricardo Walther vs Hugo Calderano

Volume:
$120

WTT - Men's Singles: Ricardo Walther vs Hugo Calderano

 - Polymarket

WTT - Men's Singles: Ricardo Walther vs Hugo Calderano - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Apr 18, 2026

Closed: Mar 1, 6:00 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

WTT - Men's Singles: Ricardo Walther vs Hugo Calderano

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$120
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 1

Description

This market refers to the table tennis match between Ricardo Walther and Hugo Calderano in a WTT event, scheduled for February 22 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Walther' if Ricardo Walther wins against Hugo Calderano. This market will resolve to 'Calderano' if Hugo Calderano wins against Ricardo Walther. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.