TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$113,466,932

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,423,222,590

402,751

Markets across

30,217

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,632

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
WTT - Men's Singles: Jingkun Liang vs Horacio Cifuentes
polymarket

WTT - Men's Singles: Jingkun Liang vs Horacio Cifuentes

Volume:
$448

WTT - Men's Singles: Jingkun Liang vs Horacio Cifuentes

 - Polymarket

WTT - Men's Singles: Jingkun Liang vs Horacio Cifuentes - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Apr 17, 2026

Closed: Apr 7, 1:40 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

WTT - Men's Singles: Jingkun Liang vs Horacio Cifuentes

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$448
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 1

Description

This market refers to the table tennis match between Jingkun Liang and Horacio Cifuentes in a WTT event, scheduled for March 31 at 1:40AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Liang' if Jingkun Liang wins against Horacio Cifuentes. This market will resolve to 'Cifuentes' if Horacio Cifuentes wins against Jingkun Liang. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.