TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$113,466,932

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,423,222,590

402,751

Markets across

30,217

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,632

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens
polymarket
predict

Who will win the Noskova vs Mertens Wimbledon match?

Volume:
$1,801,144

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens

all

2 markets

Polymarket

Predict

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 8, 2026

Closed: Jul 15, 6:00 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$1,730,191
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
predict

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens

N/A
N/A
—
$8,502
$9,855
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens Set 1 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.7¢
N/A
$19,929
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens Set 2 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$17,957
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens Set Handicap +/-1.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$3,420
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens Set 1 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$252
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens Match O/U 22.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$17,608
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens Total Sets: O/U 2.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,074
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens Match O/U 23.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$559
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens Match O/U 21.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$282
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens Set 1 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$16
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens Set 2 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens Set 1 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens Set 2 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Linda Noskova vs Elise Mertens Set 2 O/U 10.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 16

Intro

This market tracks whether the Wimbledon WTA match between Linda Noskova and Elise Mertens will be completed through normal play. Aggregated across Polymarket and Predict, the consensus probability stands at 100.0% for match completion. Resolution is determined by WTA official scoring records at wtatennis.com/scores. The match is scheduled for July 8, 2026 at 6:00 AM ET, with the completion betting period closing on that date.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: The Polymarket completion market has narrower resolution criteria (requires full normal play, no forfeits) compared to the Polymarket and Predict winner markets (which reward the advancing player on retirement/default). This creates a logical fork: a single match outcome can resolve differently depending on which market type you hold.Hero tip: Understand your market type before trading. Winner markets reward advancement by any means (including opponent retirement); completion markets only reward matches finished through normal play. In a retirement scenario, you could win the winner market but lose the completion market on the same match.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket Winner: Resolves to the player who advances. If match begins but is not completed due to retirement, default, or disqualification, resolves to the advancing player. Walkover (pre-match withdrawal) resolves 50-50. Key quote: 'If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances.'
  • Polymarket Completion: Resolves to Yes only if all games and sets required to determine a winner are played to completion through normal play. Any forfeit, including retirement or walkover, resolves to No. Key quote: 'If a forfeit of any kind occurs, including but not limited to a walkover or retirement, this market will resolve to No.'
  • Predict Winner: Resolves to the player who advances. Mirrors Polymarket winner logic: retirement/default/disqualification results in advancing player winning; walkover resolves 50-50. Key quote: 'If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances.'
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Linda Noskova and Elise Mertens in the Wimbledon WTA, originally scheduled for July 8, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Linda Noskova' if Linda Noskova advances against Elise Mertens. This market will resolve to 'Elise Mertens' if Elise Mertens advances against Linda Noskova. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Predict

This market refers to the tennis match between Linda Noskova and Elise Mertens in the Wimbledon WTA, originally scheduled for July 8, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Linda Noskova' if Linda Noskova advances against Elise Mertens. This market will resolve to 'Elise Mertens' if Elise Mertens advances against Linda Noskova. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets and sportsbooks price tennis matches through different mechanisms. Sportsbooks set odds based on their risk models and aim to balance liability; prediction markets let traders set prices through supply and demand, often reflecting crowd wisdom more directly. Prediction market odds can move faster in response to breaking news—injuries, weather, or betting patterns—while sportsbooks may lag. Neither is inherently more accurate, but comparing both gives you a fuller picture. Many sharp bettors monitor both to spot mispricings and arbitrage opportunities.

Polymarket and Predict can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, liquidity pools, and fee structures, which can cause temporary price gaps. Polymarket may have deeper liquidity in tennis markets, while Predict might draw traders with different information or risk appetite. Regulatory differences, platform UI design, and user base geography also play a role. These spreads typically narrow as arbitrageurs exploit them, but during low-volume periods or fast-moving news, gaps can persist. Monitoring both prices helps you identify when one platform is mispricing relative to the other.

Several catalysts can shift odds before the match begins. Player injury announcements or withdrawal news would trigger sharp repricing. Recent tournament form, head-to-head records, and court conditions at Wimbledon influence trader conviction. Weather forecasts, particularly for grass-court play, can matter. Betting action from sharp money or large institutional traders often moves prices noticeably. Media coverage highlighting one player's momentum or the other's struggles also drives sentiment. Watch for late-breaking news on player fitness, coaching changes, or unexpected upsets in earlier rounds that might affect confidence in either competitor.