TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Wimbledon WTA: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina
limitless
kalshi
polymarket

Who will win Tjen vs Kasatkina?

Volume:
$2,176,303

Daria Kasatkina

 - Kalshi

Daria Kasatkina - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 1, 2026

Closed: Jul 1, 8:50 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Daria Kasatkina

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$907,189
N/A
N/A
$409,809
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina Set 1 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$3,502
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina Match O/U 21.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$56
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina Match O/U 23.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$48
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina Total Sets: O/U 2.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$37
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina Match O/U 22.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina Set 1 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina Set 1 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina Set 1 O/U 10.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Janice Tjen

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$823,476
N/A
N/A
$413,369
Settled
No
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$436,006
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
limitless

Wimbledon: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
0¢
N/A
$20
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina Set 2 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5,592
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina Set Handicap +/-1.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$241
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina Set 2 O/U 8.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina Set 2 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Janice Tjen vs Daria Kasatkina Set 2 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 18

Intro

This market tracks whether Daria Kasatkina will defeat Janice Tjen in their professional tennis match at the 2026 Wimbledon Women's Singles Round of 64. Across Polymarket, Limitless, and Kalshi, the aggregated consensus stands at 100.0% for match completion. Resolution is determined by the official Wimbledon tournament records. Watch for the scheduled match on July 1, 2026, as the platforms show material divergence in how they define valid match outcomes, particularly around retirements and walkovers.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Three platforms define match resolution and advancement differently. Kalshi uses minimal threshold (ball played); Polymarket splits into two markets with strict completion vs. advancement logic; Limitless accepts any official winner including non-completion scenarios. Retirement, walkover, and default outcomes produce different resolutions across platforms.Hero tip: Treat Polymarket Completed Match as the strictest filter—it resolves No on any non-completion. Kalshi and Limitless are more permissive. If you expect a potential withdrawal or injury risk, Polymarket Completed Match offers downside protection (No resolution), while Limitless offers upside capture (winner declared). Polymarket Match Winner splits the difference: it honors mid-match retirements but treats pre-match walkovers as 50-50.

Critical divergence points:

  • Kalshi: Resolves Yes if either player wins after a ball has been played. No distinction between normal completion and retirement/walkover. Minimal threshold logic. Key Quote: 'after a ball has been played.'
  • Polymarket (Completed Match): Resolves Yes only if all games and sets are played to completion through normal play. Resolves No on any forfeit, walkover, retirement, or cancellation. Strictest completion requirement. Key Quote: 'If a forfeit of any kind occurs, including but not limited to a walkover or retirement, this market will resolve to No.'
  • Polymarket (Match Winner): Resolves to advancing player if match begins but incomplete due to retirement/default/disqualification. Resolves 50-50 on pre-match walkover. Hybrid logic: honors mid-match advancement but treats pre-match withdrawal as tie. Key Quote: 'If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances.'
  • Limitless: Resolves to official match winner regardless of method—walkover, retirement, withdrawal, default, or disqualification all count as valid wins. Most permissive logic. Key Quote: 'a player officially declared the winner of the match will be considered to have defeated the opponent, including in cases of walkover, retirement, withdrawal, default, or disqualification.'
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Janice Tjen and Daria Kasatkina in the Wimbledon WTA, originally scheduled for July 1, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Janice Tjen' if Janice Tjen advances against Daria Kasatkina. This market will resolve to 'Daria Kasatkina' if Daria Kasatkina advances against Janice Tjen. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Kalshi

This market covers the professional tennis match between Janice Tjen and Daria Kasatkina in the 2026 Wimbledon Women Singles Round Of 64. Resolution requires that a ball has been played in the match. If the match does not occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or other cancellation, the market resolves to a fair price. If the match is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled match concludes, provided this occurs within two weeks of the original scheduled date.

Limitless

This market will resolve to "Janice Tjen" if Janice Tjen defeats Daria Kasatkina in their Wimbledon match originally scheduled for July 1, 2026, 09:03 UTC. It will resolve to "Daria Kasatkina" if Daria Kasatkina defeats Janice Tjen. For the purposes of this market, a player officially declared the winner of the match will be considered to have defeated the opponent, including in cases of walkover, retirement, withdrawal, default, or disqualification.

Frequently asked questions

PredictionHero aggregates trader sentiment on the Tjen vs Kasatkina tennis match across multiple prediction platforms, including Polymarket and Kalshi. This cross-platform dashboard lets you monitor real-time odds and consensus probability shifts as the event approaches. By tracking positions across venues, you gain visibility into how different trader communities are pricing the same matchup, revealing where conviction is strongest and where disagreement exists. The aggregated view helps identify arbitrage opportunities and market-wide sentiment trends leading up to the match.

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price events using different mechanisms. Sportsbooks set odds to balance liability and extract margin; prediction markets rely on trader supply and demand to discover prices. Prediction markets often reflect sharper, crowd-sourced analysis because traders have direct financial incentive to identify mispricings. However, sportsbooks may move faster on breaking news due to dedicated risk management teams. Comparing this market's odds to major sportsbook lines can reveal which venue undervalues or overvalues each player, signaling potential value for informed bettors.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Platform differences in liquidity, user base composition, and fee structures naturally create price variation. Kalshi and Limitless may attract traders with different expertise, risk appetites, or information sets, causing one venue to price the match higher or lower than the other. Regulatory frameworks and contract design also influence how each platform frames the outcome, which can shift implied probabilities. Monitoring these divergences helps traders spot mispricings and execute cross-platform strategies before consensus narrows.

Player injury announcements, recent tournament results, and head-to-head performance trends are primary catalysts for price movement. Withdrawal or retirement by either competitor would trigger immediate repricing. Court surface preference, weather forecasts closer to the event date, and seeding changes within the tournament bracket can also shift trader positioning. Media coverage highlighting form or controversy may sway sentiment. Watch for official tournament updates and player statements that could alter perceived match difficulty or competitive advantage before the final whistle.