TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$113,466,932

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,423,222,590

402,751

Markets across

30,217

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,632

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls
polymarket
kalshi

Who will win Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls?

Volume:
$3,761

Jesika Maleckova / Miriam Skoch

all

2 markets

Kalshi

Polymarket

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 2, 2026

Closed: Jul 2, 1:10 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Jesika Maleckova / Miriam Skoch

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$1,908
N/A
N/A
$1,833
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$526
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls Set 2 O/U 8.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.5¢
N/A
$28
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Tereza Mihalikova / Olivia Nicholls

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$1,299
N/A
N/A
$1,244
Settled
No
polymarket

Completed Match

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.5¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls Set 1 O/U 9.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls Total Sets: O/U 2.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls Match O/U 21.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls Match O/U 22.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls Set 1 O/U 8.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls Set 1 O/U 10.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls Set Handicap +/-1.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls Match O/U 23.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls Set 2 Winner

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls Set 1 Winner

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls Set 2 O/U 9.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.5¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Maleckova/Skoch vs Mihalikova/Nicholls Set 2 O/U 10.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.9¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 17

Description

This event group covers a Wimbledon WTA doubles match between Maleckova/Skoch and Mihalikova/Nicholls, originally scheduled for July 2, 2026 at 6:00 AM ET in the Round of 64. Markets track both the match winner and whether the match is completed under normal play conditions.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Polymarket's winner and completion markets contain conflicting logic for retirement/forfeit scenarios, and Kalshi's minimal forfeit language creates interpretation risk across platforms.Hero tip: Monitor for any mid-match retirement or walkover. Polymarket winner and completion will diverge; Kalshi's outcome depends on whether ball-in-play overrides forfeit rules. Request clarification from Kalshi on forfeit handling before match day.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket (Winner): Resolves to advancing team if match begins and one team retires/defaults/is disqualified. Resolves 50-50 for pre-match walkovers. Key Quote: 'If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances.'
  • Polymarket (Completion): Resolves to No if any forfeit occurs, including retirement or walkover. No payout on incomplete matches. Key Quote: 'If a forfeit of any kind occurs, including but not limited to a walkover or retirement, this market will resolve to No.'
  • Kalshi: Resolves to Yes if either team wins after a ball has been played. No explicit forfeit or retirement clause; silence suggests ball-in-play is the only gate. Key Quote: 'If Jesika Maleckova / Miriam Skoch wins...after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.'
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the doubles tennis match between Maleckova/Skoch and Mihalikova/Nicholls in the Wimbledon WTA, originally scheduled for July 2, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Maleckova/Skoch' if the team of Maleckova/Skoch advances against Mihalikova/Nicholls. This market will resolve to 'Mihalikova/Nicholls' if the team of Mihalikova/Nicholls advances against Maleckova/Skoch. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (a team withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Kalshi

Resolution requires that a ball be played in the match, establishing that the match has officially commenced. The winning pair is determined by standard professional tennis match rules. If the match does not occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or other cancellation, the market resolves to a fair price. Postponements or delays do not close the market; it remains open and resolves after the rescheduled match concludes, provided this occurs within two weeks of the original date.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi differ from traditional sportsbooks in that traders directly set odds through supply and demand rather than oddsmakers posting fixed lines. This market-driven approach often reflects sharper, more dynamic pricing as participants with specialized knowledge continuously adjust positions. Sportsbooks typically build in wider margins and adjust more slowly. Comparing this market's odds to major sportsbooks can reveal value opportunities, though prediction markets generally tighten closer to event time as uncertainty resolves.

Polymarket and Kalshi operate under different regulatory frameworks, user bases, and liquidity conditions, which naturally produces pricing gaps. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform's fee structure, contract design, and trader composition also influence how quickly information is priced in. Arbitrage traders may exploit these spreads, but transaction costs and platform-specific rules can prevent full convergence. Monitoring both venues helps you identify temporary mispricings and understand which platform's consensus is leading the price discovery process.

Player injuries, withdrawals, or fitness concerns for any of the four competitors would trigger sharp repricing. Recent tournament performance, head-to-head records, and court surface preference shifts can also shift trader conviction. Weather forecasts affecting play conditions and seeding announcements may influence implied probabilities. Media reports on team chemistry or coaching changes could move odds. As the match date approaches, pre-match betting activity and late-breaking news typically accelerate volatility, so monitor this market closely in the final hours.