TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$126,324,530

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,434,646,834

406,019

Markets across

30,401

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,689

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette
polymarket
kalshi

Who will win Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette?

Volume:
$36,251

Magali Kempen / Alexandra Panova

all

2 markets

Kalshi

Polymarket

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 2, 2026

Closed: Jul 2, 12:25 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Magali Kempen / Alexandra Panova

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$20,251
N/A
N/A
$6,598
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$1,109
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette Total Sets: O/U 2.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.5¢
N/A
$48
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette Match O/U 21.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette Match O/U 22.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette Set 1 O/U 10.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Iva Jovic / Magda Linette

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$14,707
N/A
N/A
$6,958
Settled
No
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette Set Handicap +/-1.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.5¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette Set 1 Winner

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette Match O/U 23.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.5¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette Set 2 Winner

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.9¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette Set 2 O/U 8.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette Set 1 O/U 8.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette Set 2 O/U 9.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette Set 1 O/U 9.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Kempen/Panova vs Jovic/Linette Set 2 O/U 10.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 17

Description

This event group covers a professional women's doubles tennis match at Wimbledon 2026 between the team of Magali Kempen and Alexandra Panova versus Iva Jovic and Magda Linette, scheduled for July 2, 2026. The markets track both whether the match will be completed under normal play conditions and which team will advance.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Polymarket requires full match completion through normal play and treats all forfeits/retirements as No resolution, while Kalshi accepts any team advancement after a ball is played, including retirements and defaults, as a Yes resolution.Hero tip: If the match is played but ends via retirement, default, or disqualification before completion, Polymarket pays No while Kalshi pays Yes to the advancing team. Monitor live match conditions closely. A full match completion benefits both platforms uniformly, but any early termination creates divergent outcomes.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Match Completion Standard - Resolves Yes only if all games and sets required to determine a winner are played to completion through normal play. Any forfeit, walkover, retirement, or incomplete match resolves No. Quote: 'If a forfeit of any kind occurs, including but not limited to a walkover or retirement, this market will resolve No.'
  • Kalshi: Winner Determination Standard - Resolves Yes if either team wins after a ball has been played, explicitly including retirements, defaults, and disqualifications. Quote: 'If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances.'
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the doubles tennis match between Kempen/Panova and Jovic/Linette in the Wimbledon WTA, originally scheduled for July 2, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Kempen/Panova' if the team of Kempen/Panova advances against Jovic/Linette. This market will resolve to 'Jovic/Linette' if the team of Jovic/Linette advances against Kempen/Panova. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (a team withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Kalshi

Resolution requires that a ball be played in the match, establishing that the match has officially commenced. The winning pair is determined by standard professional tennis match rules. If the match does not occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or other cancellation, the market resolves to a fair price. Postponements or delays do not close the market; it remains open and resolves after the rescheduled match concludes, provided this occurs within two weeks of the original date.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi operate on peer-to-peer order books where traders directly set prices, whereas traditional sportsbooks employ oddsmakers and margin-building spreads. Prediction market prices often reflect sharper, more efficient consensus because traders risk real capital and face no house edge. Sportsbooks build in vigorish and may shade lines based on liability management. For this match, comparing the implied probabilities here to major sportsbook lines can reveal whether the market is pricing Kempen/Panova or Jovic/Linette as favorites differently than conventional betting venues.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, liquidity pools, and fee structures, which can create temporary price gaps. Polymarket's order-book model and Kalshi's binary contract design may also process information at different speeds. Geographic restrictions, platform-specific incentives, and varying levels of market depth between the two venues can cause the implied probability for Jovic/Linette or Kempen/Panova to diverge by several percentage points. Arbitrage traders often exploit these spreads, but gaps can persist if one platform has lighter volume or different user bases focused on this doubles match.

Injury reports, recent head-to-head records, and player form leading into the tournament are key catalysts. Draws and seeding announcements can shift perceptions of matchup difficulty. Live trading during earlier rounds may reveal which pairing is playing sharper tennis. Weather conditions at the All England Club, court surface adjustments, and momentum from prior matches can all influence trader positioning. Social media sentiment, expert commentary, and betting syndicate activity on other platforms may also trigger repricing as new information emerges closer to the scheduled match date.