TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$113,466,932

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,423,222,590

402,751

Markets across

30,217

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,632

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech
polymarket
kalshi

Who will win Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech?

Volume:
$29,455

Storm Hunter / Caty McNally

 - Kalshi

Storm Hunter / Caty McNally - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 3, 2026

Closed: Jul 3, 1:15 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Storm Hunter / Caty McNally

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$15,355
N/A
N/A
$7,726
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$953
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Anna Bondar / Magdalena Frech

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$13,147
N/A
N/A
$9,122
Settled
No
polymarket

Completed Match

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech Set 1 Winner

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech Set 2 Winner

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech Set Handicap +/-1.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech Set 1 O/U 8.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.9¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech Match O/U 21.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech Set 1 O/U 9.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.9¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech Match O/U 22.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech Set 1 O/U 10.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.9¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech Match O/U 23.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech Total Sets: O/U 2.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech Set 2 O/U 8.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.9¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech Set 2 O/U 9.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Hunter/McNally vs Bondar/Frech Set 2 O/U 10.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 17

Description

This event group covers a professional women's doubles tennis match between Storm Hunter/Caty McNally and Anna Bondar/Magdalena Frech at the 2026 Wimbledon Championships, scheduled for July 2, 2026. The group contains three related prediction markets across Polymarket and Kalshi that assess match completion, winner determination, and outcome resolution under different rule frameworks.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Three related markets have different scope: one requires full match completion through normal play only, while two others accept retirement/default as valid completion. Kalshi also lacks explicit tie-breaking rules for cancellations or delays.Hero tip: Identify which market you are trading. Polymarket's Completed Match market is binary (Yes/No) and rejects retirements; Polymarket's Winner market and Kalshi's market resolve to the advancing team even on retirement. If retirement is likely, trade the Winner or Kalshi market, not the Completed Match market. Watch for scheduling delays beyond 7 days, which Polymarket penalizes but Kalshi does not explicitly address.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket (Completed Match): Binary market resolves Yes only if all games and sets are played to completion through normal play. Resolves No on any forfeit, retirement, walkover, cancellation, tie, or delay beyond 7 days without a winner. Primary source: official WTA statistics or credible consensus within 2 hours of conclusion. Key Quote: 'If a forfeit of any kind occurs, including but not limited to a walkover or retirement, this market will resolve No.'
  • Polymarket (Winner Market): Three-way market (Hunter/McNally, Bondar/Frech, or 50-50 tie). Resolves to advancing team if one team wins after a ball is played, even on retirement/default/disqualification. Resolves 50-50 on cancellation, tie, delay beyond 7 days, or walkover (withdrawal before start). Primary source: official WTA Tour information or credible consensus. Key Quote: 'If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances.'
  • Kalshi: Binary market (Yes/No) resolves Yes if either team wins after a ball has been played. Does not explicitly address cancellations, ties, delays, or walkovers. Implicitly accepts retirement/default as valid completion. Key Quote: 'If Storm Hunter / Caty McNally wins...after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.'
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the doubles tennis match between Hunter/McNally and Bondar/Frech in the Wimbledon WTA, originally scheduled for July 2, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Hunter/McNally' if the team of Hunter/McNally advances against Bondar/Frech. This market will resolve to 'Bondar/Frech' if the team of Bondar/Frech advances against Hunter/McNally. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (a team withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Kalshi

Resolution requires that a ball be played in the match, establishing that competition has commenced. The winning team is determined by standard professional tennis match rules. If the match fails to occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or other cancellation, the market resolves to a fair price per standard procedures. Postponements or delays do not close the market; it remains open and resolves after the rescheduled match concludes, provided this occurs within two weeks of the original date.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets like those tracked here operate on peer-to-peer or order-book mechanics, where traders directly set prices through supply and demand rather than a sportsbook's fixed margin model. Traditional sportsbooks embed a built-in edge and adjust lines to balance liability; prediction markets reflect pure crowd belief. This market's odds may diverge from major sportsbooks because prediction traders often have longer time horizons, different information access, or contrarian views. Comparing this market to your preferred sportsbook can reveal value opportunities before the match begins.

Polymarket and Kalshi serve different trader bases, regulatory frameworks, and liquidity pools. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Polymarket uses an automated market maker model with continuous pricing, while Kalshi operates an order-book exchange requiring active buyers and sellers. Differences in user geography, deposit methods, and risk appetite also drive price gaps. Additionally, the two platforms may frame the outcome slightly differently—one may ask about a specific player pairing's victory, while the other focuses on match result—creating subtle arbitrage opportunities for sharp traders monitoring both venues.

Player injuries, withdrawals, or late lineup changes announced before the match could trigger sharp repricing. Recent form updates, head-to-head records, and court-surface performance data may shift trader sentiment as the event approaches. Weather conditions at the All England Club, seeding changes, or unexpected upsets in earlier rounds could also influence confidence in either pairing. News coverage, expert commentary, and social media momentum around individual players may attract new traders to this market, increasing volume and volatility in the final hours before the match begins.