TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$141,541,542
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,440,096,988
406,065
Markets across
30,522
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,692
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 2, 9:55 AM EST
Kalshi
A doubles tennis match between Guo/Mladenovic and Burrage/Stojsavljevic at the 2026 Wimbledon WTA Championships, scheduled for July 2, 2026. Markets across platforms assess whether the match will be completed and which team will advance.
This market refers to the doubles tennis match between Guo/Mladenovic and Burrage/Stojsavljevic in the Wimbledon WTA, originally scheduled for July 2, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Guo/Mladenovic' if the team of Guo/Mladenovic advances against Burrage/Stojsavljevic. This market will resolve to 'Burrage/Stojsavljevic' if the team of Burrage/Stojsavljevic advances against Guo/Mladenovic. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (a team withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolution requires that a ball be played in the match, establishing that competition has commenced. The winning team is determined by standard professional tennis match rules. If the match fails to occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or other cancellation, the market resolves to a fair price per standard procedures. Postponements or delays do not close the market; it remains open and resolves after the rescheduled match concludes, provided this occurs within two weeks of the original date.
Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform operates under distinct rules, fee structures, and user bases. Polymarket uses an automated market maker model, while Kalshi employs order-book mechanics, leading to different price discovery processes. Liquidity distribution varies too—one platform may attract more volume from tennis specialists, skewing odds. Regulatory frameworks and settlement procedures also differ slightly between venues. These structural differences mean identical information can produce different implied probabilities across platforms, creating arbitrage opportunities for traders who monitor both simultaneously.
Player injuries or withdrawal announcements typically trigger sharp repricing, as do recent warm-up tournament results and head-to-head records. Court surface conditions at Wimbledon, weather forecasts, and draw positioning can shift trader sentiment. Betting syndicates and professional sharp action often move prices in the final days before play. Media coverage highlighting form or chemistry between partners may also influence retail traders. Real-time match momentum during earlier rounds can cascade into odds adjustments for this fixture.