TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$130,522,377

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,438,389,636

404,028

Markets across

30,214

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,681

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen
polymarket
kalshi

Who will win Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen?

Volume:
$11,459

Aldila Sutjiadi / Janice Tjen

 - Kalshi

Aldila Sutjiadi / Janice Tjen - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 2, 2026

Closed: Jul 2, 12:55 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Aldila Sutjiadi / Janice Tjen

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$2,472
N/A
N/A
$2,166
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen Set 2 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen Set 1 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen Set 2 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$20
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Harriet Dart / Maia Lumsden

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$7,547
N/A
N/A
$7,514
Settled
No
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,318
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen Set Handicap +/-1.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen Set 2 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen Set 2 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen Set 1 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen Total Sets: O/U 2.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen Set 1 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen Set 1 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen Match O/U 22.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen Match O/U 23.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Dart/Lumsden vs Sutjiadi/Tjen Match O/U 21.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 17

Description

This event group covers a Wimbledon WTA doubles match between Harriet Dart/Maia Lumsden and Aldila Sutjiadi/Janice Tjen, scheduled for July 2, 2026. Multiple prediction markets track both the match outcome and whether the match completes under normal play conditions.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Polymarket and Kalshi differ in scope: Polymarket offers both outcome and completion markets with explicit 50-50 rules for walkovers and cancellations; Kalshi offers only an outcome market that resolves Yes if either team wins after a ball is played, with no mention of walkover or cancellation handling.Hero tip: Kalshi's market is simpler and outcome-only: any team win after play begins = Yes. Polymarket's completion market is stricter: only normal play completion = Yes, forfeits/retirements/walkovers = No. If the match is canceled or delayed >7 days without completion, Polymarket outcome resolves 50-50 while Kalshi's outcome market has no explicit rule. Verify match status on WTA Tour official site before settlement.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Two separate markets: (1) Outcome market resolves to advancing team or 50-50 if canceled, tied, delayed >7 days, or walkover. (2) Completion market resolves Yes only if all games/sets completed under normal play; forfeits, retirements, walkovers, and cancellations resolve No. Key quote: 'If the match ends in a walkover (a team withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50.'
  • Kalshi: Single outcome market: resolves Yes if either Dart/Lumsden or Sutjiadi/Tjen wins after a ball has been played. No explicit rules for walkovers, cancellations, or retirements. Key quote: 'If Harriet Dart / Maia Lumsden wins the Dart / Lumsden vs Sutjiadi / Tjen professional tennis match in the 2026 Wimbledon Women Doubles Round Of 64 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.'
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the doubles tennis match between Dart/Lumsden and Sutjiadi/Tjen in the Wimbledon WTA, originally scheduled for July 2, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Dart/Lumsden' if the team of Dart/Lumsden advances against Sutjiadi/Tjen. This market will resolve to 'Sutjiadi/Tjen' if the team of Sutjiadi/Tjen advances against Dart/Lumsden. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (a team withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Kalshi

Resolution requires that a ball be played in the match to confirm it has officially commenced. The market resolves to Yes for whichever team wins the match after play has begun. If the match is cancelled before any ball is played due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or other circumstances, the market resolves to a fair price per standard rules. Should the match be postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes following the rescheduled match completion within two weeks.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets like these operate on supply and demand from retail and professional traders, often reflecting real-time sentiment shifts faster than traditional sportsbooks adjust their lines. Sportsbooks manage risk through margin and limits, while prediction markets aggregate distributed opinion with minimal friction. For this matchup, prediction market odds may diverge from sportsbook spreads due to different liquidity pools, trader composition, and settlement mechanics. Direct comparison requires checking major sportsbooks simultaneously, as prediction markets sometimes lead or lag conventional betting markets depending on information flow and trader activity.

On Polymarket, traders set odds through an automated market maker, while Kalshi uses order-book mechanics with regulatory oversight. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, risk tolerances, and liquidity profiles. Polymarket's larger user base may price in broader sentiment, whereas Kalshi's structured environment can reflect more conservative or institutional positioning. Settlement timing, fee structures, and platform-specific rules also influence how each venue prices the Dart/Lumsden versus Sutjiadi/Tjen outcome, creating natural arbitrage opportunities for cross-platform traders.

Player injuries, withdrawals, or fitness updates for any of the four competitors could trigger sharp repricing. Recent head-to-head records, court conditions, and draw positioning within the tournament bracket influence trader conviction. Media coverage, expert commentary, and betting syndicate activity often precede retail-driven moves. Changes in implied odds on related markets—such as singles outcomes for Dart, Lumsden, Sutjiadi, or Tjen—can cascade into this doubles market. Monitor official Wimbledon announcements and tennis injury reports for catalysts that shift market consensus before the match begins.