TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$134,145,987
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,441,166,947
406,422
Markets across
30,383
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,688
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 10, 9:24 AM EST
Kalshi
This event group covers a Wimbledon WTA Women's Doubles semifinal match scheduled for July 10, 2026 between the team of Shuko Aoyama and En-Shuo Liang against Gabriela Dabrowski and Luisa Stefani. The markets track both which team advances and whether the match is completed under normal play conditions.
This market refers to the doubles tennis match between Aoyama/Liang and Dabrowski/Stefani in the Wimbledon WTA, originally scheduled for July 10, 2026 at 8:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Aoyama/Liang' if the team of Aoyama/Liang advances against Dabrowski/Stefani. This market will resolve to 'Dabrowski/Stefani' if the team of Dabrowski/Stefani advances against Aoyama/Liang. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (a team withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolution requires that a ball has been played in the match. The market resolves to Yes for whichever team wins the match. If the match does not occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or other cancellation, the market resolves to a fair price per standard rules. If the match is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled match concludes, provided this occurs within two weeks of the original date.
Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform operates under different regulatory frameworks, user bases, and market-making incentives. Kalshi and Polymarket may attract traders with varying risk appetites or information sets, causing temporary price gaps. Arbitrage opportunities can emerge if one platform prices the outcome significantly higher or lower than the other, though transaction costs and withdrawal delays often prevent perfect convergence. Monitoring both venues helps you identify mispricings and understand where smart money is positioning ahead of the match.
Player injuries, withdrawal announcements, or recent form updates could shift odds significantly before the match begins. Betting action from sharp traders or institutional players often moves prices in the days leading up to the event. Court conditions, draw positioning, and head-to-head records between the pairs may also influence trader positioning. Real-time match momentum—if the event is already underway—will drive rapid repricing as each set progresses, making this market highly responsive to live developments.