TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$141,541,542

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,440,096,988

406,065

Markets across

30,522

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,692

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean
kalshi
limitless
polymarket

Who will win Snigur vs Jeanjean?

Volume:
$359,182

Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean

all

2 markets

Polymarket

Limitless

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 2, 2026

Closed: Jul 9, 6:00 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$81,496
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
limitless

Wimbledon: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0¢
N/A
$1
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
kalshi

Daria Snigur

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$44,299
N/A
N/A
$28,513
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean Set 1 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$980
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean Set Handicap +/-1.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$288
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean Set 2 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean Set 1 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean Set 1 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Leolia Jeanjean

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$232,015
N/A
N/A
$135,986
Settled
No
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean Match O/U 21.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean Set 2 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean Set 2 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean Match O/U 23.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean Total Sets: O/U 2.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean Match O/U 22.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean Set 2 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Daria Snigur vs Leolia Jeanjean Set 1 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 18

Description

This event group covers the professional tennis match between Daria Snigur and Leolia Jeanjean scheduled for Wimbledon 2026 Women's Singles Round of 64. Three prediction markets across different platforms attempt to resolve on the match outcome, but they differ significantly in how they handle match completion, walkovers, and retirement scenarios.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Polymarket's two markets have internal contradiction on retirement/default handling, and both diverge from Kalshi/Limitless on walkover treatment. Kalshi and Limitless are aligned but represent a minority position on match completion requirements.Hero tip: If you expect a retirement or default scenario, avoid Polymarket's Completed Match market (it resolves No). Polymarket's Winner market and Kalshi/Limitless will resolve to the advancing player. For pre-match walkovers, Polymarket Winner resolves 50-50 while Kalshi/Limitless resolve to the advancing player—this is the clearest arbitrage opportunity.

Critical divergence points:

  • Kalshi: Resolves Yes to either player if officially declared winner after a ball is played. Accepts walkover, retirement, withdrawal, default, or disqualification as valid win conditions. Requires only that a ball has been played.
  • Limitless: Resolves to the advancing player (Snigur or Jeanjean). Explicitly includes walkover, retirement, withdrawal, default, or disqualification as valid win determinations. No distinction between normal play and forfeit scenarios.
  • Polymarket (Completed Match): Resolves Yes only if all games and sets are played to completion through normal play. Resolves No on any forfeit including walkover, retirement, default, or disqualification. Requires full match completion.
  • Polymarket (Winner Market): Resolves to advancing player if match begins but incomplete due to retirement/default/disqualification. Resolves 50-50 on pre-match walkover. Accepts mid-match forfeits as valid advancement but treats pre-match withdrawal differently.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Daria Snigur and Leolia Jeanjean in the Wimbledon WTA, originally scheduled for July 2, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Daria Snigur' if Daria Snigur advances against Leolia Jeanjean. This market will resolve to 'Leolia Jeanjean' if Leolia Jeanjean advances against Daria Snigur. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Kalshi

This event resolves based on the result of the Snigur vs Jeanjean professional tennis match in the 2026 Wimbledon Women Singles Round Of 64, contingent upon a ball being played to confirm the match has started. The match must actually occur for resolution; if it does not take place due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or other cancellation before play begins, the market resolves to a fair price. If the match is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and will close following the rescheduled match completion, provided this occurs within two weeks of the original date.

Limitless

This market will resolve to "Daria Snigur" if Daria Snigur defeats Leolia Jeanjean in their Wimbledon match originally scheduled for July 1, 2026, 09:03 UTC. It will resolve to "Leolia Jeanjean" if Leolia Jeanjean defeats Daria Snigur. For the purposes of this market, a player officially declared the winner of the match will be considered to have defeated the opponent, including in cases of walkover, retirement, withdrawal, default, or disqualification.

Frequently asked questions

This dashboard aggregates prediction market pricing for the Snigur vs Jeanjean tennis match across Polymarket and Kalshi, allowing you to monitor real-time consensus on the match outcome. Traders on each platform independently price their contracts, creating a cross-platform view of how the market perceives each player's winning chances. By tracking both venues, you can spot pricing inefficiencies and see how conviction shifts as new information emerges. The aggregated perspective helps identify which platform is leading price discovery or where consensus is strongest.

Prediction markets and sportsbooks price events differently because they operate under distinct incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets rely on trader consensus to discover price. Prediction markets often reflect sharper, more efficient pricing because traders have direct financial exposure and no house edge to protect. However, sportsbooks may move faster on breaking news due to their professional risk management. Comparing this market across both venues reveals how crowd-sourced pricing diverges from traditional bookmaker lines.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, liquidity pools, and risk appetites, which naturally produces price variation. Polymarket and Kalshi may also have different contract structures or settlement rules that influence how traders value the same outcome. Arbitrage opportunities arise when one platform prices a player's chances significantly higher or lower than the other. These gaps typically close as informed traders exploit the difference, but timing, regulatory constraints, and user base composition can sustain temporary divergence between the two venues.

Player injury announcements, recent tournament performance, and surface-specific form shifts are primary catalysts that reshape trader conviction. Draws, seeding changes, and opponent matchups in earlier rounds can also influence perceived difficulty. Weather forecasts closer to the event date may favor one player's style over the other. Media coverage, betting syndicate activity, and sharp money flowing into one side can trigger rapid repricing. Monitor both players' warm-up tournament results and any coaching or equipment changes as the match date approaches.