TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$141,541,542

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,440,096,988

406,065

Markets across

30,522

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,692

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic
limitless
polymarket

Who will win Bencic vs Stojsavljevic?

Volume:
$90,701

Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic

all

2 markets

Polymarket

Limitless

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 29, 2026

Closed: Jul 6, 6:00 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$85,003
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
limitless

Wimbledon: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0¢
N/A
$3
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic Set 1 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$5,265
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic Set Handicap +/-1.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$113
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic Set 2 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$29
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic Set 1 O/U 8.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$217
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic Match O/U 21.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$51
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic Total Sets: O/U 2.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$10
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic Match O/U 22.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$6
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic Set 1 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$3
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic Set 2 O/U 8.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic Match O/U 23.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic Set 1 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic Set 2 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Belinda Bencic vs Mika Stojsavljevic Set 2 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 16

Description

This event group covers the Wimbledon WTA tennis match between Belinda Bencic and Mika Stojsavljevic, originally scheduled for June 29, 2026 at 09:03 UTC (6:00 AM ET). Markets track both the match winner and whether the match is completed under normal play conditions.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Walkover resolution treatment differs between platforms. Limitless resolves walkovers to the declared winner; Polymarket resolves walkovers to 50-50. Additionally, Polymarket includes a separate completion market with stricter normal-play requirements.Hero tip: If a walkover occurs, Limitless will show a winner while Polymarket will split 50-50. The Polymarket completion market (Yes/No) explicitly penalizes any non-completion scenario. Traders should monitor pre-match withdrawal risk and position accordingly on each platform.

Critical divergence points:

  • Limitless: Winner-takes-all resolution. Any official winner declaration (including walkover, retirement, default, disqualification) resolves to that player. No 50-50 outcome for walkovers.
  • Polymarket: Walkover resolves to 50-50; retirement/default/disqualification resolves to advancing player. Separate completion market (Yes/No) requires full match play under normal conditions. Cancellation, tie, or delay beyond 7 days also resolves to 50-50.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Belinda Bencic and Mika Stojsavljevic in the Wimbledon WTA, originally scheduled for June 29, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Belinda Bencic' if Belinda Bencic advances against Mika Stojsavljevic. This market will resolve to 'Mika Stojsavljevic' if Mika Stojsavljevic advances against Belinda Bencic. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Limitless

This market will resolve to "Belinda Bencic" if Belinda Bencic defeats Mika Stojsavljevic in their Wimbledon match originally scheduled for June 29, 2026, 09:03 UTC. It will resolve to "Mika Stojsavljevic" if Mika Stojsavljevic defeats Belinda Bencic. For the purposes of this market, a player officially declared the winner of the match will be considered to have defeated the opponent, including in cases of walkover, retirement, withdrawal, default, or disqualification.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price outcomes differently. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets rely on trader consensus—real money flowing toward outcomes perceived as undervalued. This market aggregates odds from decentralized platforms where participants directly stake capital, often reflecting sharper, less-constrained pricing than retail sportsbooks. Comparing this market's implied probability to major sportsbook lines can reveal where public perception and trader conviction diverge, especially for lower-profile matchups.

Both platforms track the same underlying event, yet price divergence is common. Polymarket and Limitless can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Differences stem from distinct user bases, liquidity pools, fee structures, and order-flow timing. Polymarket may attract traders with different risk appetites or information sets than Limitless, causing temporary mispricings. Arbitrageurs can exploit these gaps, but friction costs and platform-specific rules often prevent instant convergence. Monitoring both venues reveals where conviction is strongest and where uncertainty persists.