TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$133,388,117
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,436,095,462
405,232
Markets across
30,526
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,693
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Set 1 O/U 8.5
- Polymarket
Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Set 1 O/U 8.5 - Polymarket
1W
News
Positive
Negative
Neutral
Hover marker for details
Vol.
·
Resolved Jul 1, 2026
Closed: Jul 8, 6:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This event group covers the Wimbledon WTA tennis match between Alycia Parks and Mananchaya Sawangkaew, originally scheduled for July 1, 2026. Multiple prediction markets track both the match winner and whether the match will be completed under normal play conditions.
This market refers to the tennis match between Alycia Parks and Mananchaya Sawangkaew in the Wimbledon WTA, originally scheduled for July 1, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Alycia Parks' if Alycia Parks advances against Mananchaya Sawangkaew. This market will resolve to 'Mananchaya Sawangkaew' if Mananchaya Sawangkaew advances against Alycia Parks. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market will resolve to "Alycia Parks" if Alycia Parks defeats Mananchaya Sawangkaew in their Wimbledon match originally scheduled for July 1, 2026, 09:03 UTC. It will resolve to "Mananchaya Sawangkaew" if Mananchaya Sawangkaew defeats Alycia Parks. For the purposes of this market, a player officially declared the winner of the match will be considered to have defeated the opponent, including in cases of walkover, retirement, withdrawal, default, or disqualification.
Polymarket and Limitless can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, liquidity pools, and fee structures, which naturally creates pricing variations. Limitless and Polymarket may weight recent betting activity or news flow differently, and their user bases might hold distinct views on the match outcome. Arbitrage traders typically exploit these gaps, but temporary spreads persist due to transaction costs and platform-specific trading mechanics. Monitoring both venues helps you identify which platform offers better value for your position.
Key catalysts include recent tournament performance, head-to-head records, court surface preference, and injury announcements. Weather conditions on match day, seeding changes, or unexpected upsets in earlier rounds can shift trader sentiment. Social media momentum, expert commentary, and betting syndicate activity often trigger sharp price moves. Monitor pre-match press conferences and warm-up tournaments for clues about player form, as these typically drive the largest repricing in the final days before play begins.