TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew
polymarket
limitless

Who will win Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew?

Volume:
$209,690

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Set 1 O/U 8.5

 - Polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Set 1 O/U 8.5 - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 1, 2026

Closed: Jul 8, 6:00 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Set 1 O/U 8.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Set 1 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Set 1 O/U 10.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$206,285
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
limitless

Wimbledon: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew

N/A
N/A
0¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Set Handicap +/-1.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,964
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Match O/U 21.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$419
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Set 2 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$345
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Total Sets: O/U 2.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$268
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Set 1 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$266
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Match O/U 22.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$37
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Match O/U 23.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$3
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Set 2 O/U 8.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Set 2 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon WTA: Alycia Parks vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Set 2 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 16

Description

This event group covers the Wimbledon WTA tennis match between Alycia Parks and Mananchaya Sawangkaew, originally scheduled for July 1, 2026. Multiple prediction markets track both the match winner and whether the match will be completed under normal play conditions.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Walkover treatment differs between platforms. Limitless resolves walkovers to the declared winner; Polymarket's winner market resolves pre-match walkovers to 50-50 but post-match forfeits to the advancing player. Polymarket also offers a separate completion market with distinct logic.Hero tip: Traders should distinguish between pre-match withdrawal (Polymarket 50-50, Limitless winner) and mid-match retirement (both resolve to advancing player). The Polymarket completion market is independent and resolves No for any non-standard conclusion. Verify the exact timing of any withdrawal announcement.

Critical divergence points:

  • Limitless: Winner-only market. All official declarations (including walkover, retirement, withdrawal, default, disqualification) resolve to the declared winner. No ambiguity or 50-50 outcomes. Key Quote: 'a player officially declared the winner of the match will be considered to have defeated the opponent, including in cases of walkover, retirement, withdrawal, default, or disqualification.'
  • Polymarket (Winner Market): Winner market with conditional logic. Pre-match walkovers (withdrawal before start) resolve 50-50. Mid-match forfeits (retirement, default, disqualification after start) resolve to advancing player. Normal play resolves to match winner. Cancellation, tie, or delay beyond 7 days without winner resolves 50-50. Key Quote: 'If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50' but 'If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances.'
  • Polymarket (Completion Market): Separate Yes/No market on match completion. Resolves Yes only if all games and sets required for a winner are played under normal play. Resolves No for any forfeit (including walkover, retirement), cancellation, tie, or delay beyond 7 days. Key Quote: 'This market will resolve to Yes if all games and sets required to determine a match winner under governing body or event organizer rules are played to completion through normal play. Otherwise, if the match is not completed for any reason, it will resolve to No.'
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Alycia Parks and Mananchaya Sawangkaew in the Wimbledon WTA, originally scheduled for July 1, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Alycia Parks' if Alycia Parks advances against Mananchaya Sawangkaew. This market will resolve to 'Mananchaya Sawangkaew' if Mananchaya Sawangkaew advances against Alycia Parks. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Limitless

This market will resolve to "Alycia Parks" if Alycia Parks defeats Mananchaya Sawangkaew in their Wimbledon match originally scheduled for July 1, 2026, 09:03 UTC. It will resolve to "Mananchaya Sawangkaew" if Mananchaya Sawangkaew defeats Alycia Parks. For the purposes of this market, a player officially declared the winner of the match will be considered to have defeated the opponent, including in cases of walkover, retirement, withdrawal, default, or disqualification.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price outcomes differently. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets derive prices from live trader consensus—reflecting real-time belief about who will win. This market's odds may diverge from major sportsbooks because traders continuously adjust based on new information, injury reports, or betting patterns. Comparing both sources can reveal value opportunities if one market has mispriced the matchup relative to the other.

Polymarket and Limitless can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, liquidity pools, and fee structures, which naturally creates pricing variations. Limitless and Polymarket may weight recent betting activity or news flow differently, and their user bases might hold distinct views on the match outcome. Arbitrage traders typically exploit these gaps, but temporary spreads persist due to transaction costs and platform-specific trading mechanics. Monitoring both venues helps you identify which platform offers better value for your position.

Key catalysts include recent tournament performance, head-to-head records, court surface preference, and injury announcements. Weather conditions on match day, seeding changes, or unexpected upsets in earlier rounds can shift trader sentiment. Social media momentum, expert commentary, and betting syndicate activity often trigger sharp price moves. Monitor pre-match press conferences and warm-up tournaments for clues about player form, as these typically drive the largest repricing in the final days before play begins.