TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$134,145,987

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,441,166,947

406,422

Markets across

30,383

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,688

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria
kalshi
limitless
polymarket

What is the result of Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria?

Volume:
$1,354,294

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria

all

2 markets

Polymarket

Limitless

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 2, 2026

Closed: Jul 9, 6:00 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$927,485
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
limitless

Wimbledon: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0¢
N/A
$15
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Match O/U 38.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$11,930
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Set 1 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$9,868
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Zizou Bergs -4.5 games

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$4,267
N/A
N/A
$3,430
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Zizou Bergs -1.5 games

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$1,733
N/A
N/A
$1,733
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Set Handicap +/-1.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$957
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Match O/U 36.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$221
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Total Sets: O/U 3.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$85
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Set 3 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$72
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Set 1 O/U 10.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$48
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Set 1 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$39
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Set 1 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Set 4 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$28
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Match O/U 40.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$396,466
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Set Handicap +/-2.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$413
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Zizou Bergs -7.5 games

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$318
N/A
N/A
$317
Settled
No
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Set 2 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$235
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Total Sets: O/U 4.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$81
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Set 3 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Set 4 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Set 4 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Set 4 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP: Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria Set 2 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 25 of 29

Intro

This event group tracks the outcome of the professional tennis match between Zizou Bergs and Jaime Faria at Wimbledon ATP 2026. Aggregated across Kalshi, Polymarket, and Limitless, the consensus probability stands at 100.0% for the leading outcome, with resolution determined by the ATP Tour official scores. Watch the match scheduled for July 2, 2026, as the actual event date, with final settlement occurring by the resolution deadline of July 9, 2026.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Three platforms offer structurally different settlement mechanisms: Kalshi uses game differential thresholds (quantitative), Polymarket splits match completion and winner determination with conflicting forfeit rules, and Limitless resolves on any official winner declaration including forfeits.Hero tip: These are three separate product types, not variants of the same market. Kalshi is a margin-of-victory bet; Polymarket requires careful attention to which sub-market you trade (completion vs. winner); Limitless is a pure winner market with inclusive forfeit rules. Cross-platform arbitrage is not possible. Confirm scheduled date and time discrepancies (July 1 vs. July 2; 09:03 UTC vs. 6:00 AM ET) with official ATP sources before trading.

Critical divergence points:

  • Kalshi: Three separate markets on game differential thresholds (1.5, 4.5, 7.5 games in favor of Bergs). Settlement is quantitative, not binary. Each market resolves Yes if the threshold is exceeded, No otherwise. No explicit handling of forfeits, retirements, or cancellations.
  • Polymarket: Two distinct markets: (1) Match Completion—resolves No if incomplete, forfeit, retirement, walkover, cancellation, or delayed >7 days. (2) Winner—resolves to advancing player on retirement/default/disqualification, but 50-50 on walkover or cancellation. Conflicting forfeit treatment between the two markets.
  • Limitless: Single winner market. Resolves to the player officially declared winner, including walkover, retirement, withdrawal, default, or disqualification. No distinction between normal play and forfeit scenarios.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Zizou Bergs and Jaime Faria in the Wimbledon ATP, originally scheduled for July 2, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Zizou Bergs' if Zizou Bergs advances against Jaime Faria. This market will resolve to 'Jaime Faria' if Jaime Faria advances against Zizou Bergs. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Kalshi

The event encompasses three related markets tracking game differential in the Zizou Bergs vs Jaime Faria 2026 Wimbledon Men's Singles Round of 64 match. Resolution is based on the net game advantage for either player across the full match. If the match does not commence due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation before play begins, the market resolves to a fair price. For postponed or delayed matches, markets remain open and close following the rescheduled completion within two weeks. If a player retires, markets that can be unconditionally settled based on completed play resolve accordingly; those that cannot are settled at Fair Market Price as determined by the Exchange.

Limitless

This market will resolve to "Zizou Bergs" if Zizou Bergs defeats Jaime Faria in their Wimbledon match originally scheduled for July 1, 2026, 09:03 UTC. It will resolve to "Jaime Faria" if Jaime Faria defeats Zizou Bergs. For the purposes of this market, a player officially declared the winner of the match will be considered to have defeated the opponent, including in cases of walkover, retirement, withdrawal, default, or disqualification.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets and sportsbooks price outcomes differently because they operate under distinct incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance liability and extract a margin, adjusting lines based on bet flow rather than pure probability. Prediction markets like those tracked here rely on trader consensus and real-money commitment, often reflecting longer-term conviction. This market may show tighter or wider spreads than traditional sportsbooks depending on liquidity and the sophistication of participants. For major tennis events, prediction market prices tend to converge with sportsbook consensus over time, though early divergences can signal valuable information.

Polymarket and Kalshi may price this market differently due to variations in their user base, liquidity depth, and market structure. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Polymarket frames the outcome around the Wimbledon tournament context, while Kalshi uses a games-differential format, which can attract different trader profiles and risk appetites. Liquidity imbalances, regional trader preferences, and the timing of information flow into each platform also create temporary price gaps. These differences typically narrow as arbitrageurs exploit spreads, but they persist when transaction costs or platform-specific rules make cross-venue trading impractical.

Key catalysts include recent head-to-head records, player form leading into the tournament, court surface performance history, and injury reports. Pre-match commentary from analysts and betting syndicates often shifts trader positioning as new information emerges. Weather conditions, seeding announcements, and draw-dependent factors can also influence perceived match difficulty. Live trading during the match itself—particularly early set results—typically drives the largest price swings as traders update their expectations based on actual performance. Monitor official tournament updates and player social media for late-breaking developments that could reshape market sentiment.