TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$130,522,377
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,438,389,636
404,028
Markets across
30,214
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,681
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 8, 6:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This market tracks the outcome of the Wimbledon ATP match between Rafael Jodar and Pablo Carreno Busta scheduled for July 1, 2026. The aggregated consensus across Polymarket and Limitless shows 100.0% probability for the leading outcome, with resolution determined by ATP Tour official records. Watch for the match completion on July 1, 2026, as the actual event date, since platform divergence exists between match-winner and match-completion resolution criteria.
This market refers to the tennis match between Rafael Jodar and Pablo Carreno Busta in the Wimbledon ATP, originally scheduled for July 1, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Rafael Jodar' if Rafael Jodar advances against Pablo Carreno Busta. This market will resolve to 'Pablo Carreno Busta' if Pablo Carreno Busta advances against Rafael Jodar. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market will resolve to "Rafael Jodar" if Rafael Jodar defeats Pablo Carreno Busta in their Wimbledon match originally scheduled for July 1, 2026, 09:03 UTC. It will resolve to "Pablo Carreno Busta" if Pablo Carreno Busta defeats Rafael Jodar. For the purposes of this market, a player officially declared the winner of the match will be considered to have defeated the opponent, including in cases of walkover, retirement, withdrawal, default, or disqualification.
Polymarket and Limitless can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Platform design, user base composition, and liquidity depth all influence pricing. Limitless and Polymarket serve distinct trader demographics and employ different market mechanisms—one may attract more informed tennis specialists, while the other draws broader macro traders. Regulatory environment, fee structures, and settlement speed also vary, creating windows where one platform leads or lags in reflecting breaking news, injury reports, or odds shifts from external sportsbooks. Monitoring both venues helps identify which signals are moving informed traders versus casual speculators.
Key catalysts include recent head-to-head records, surface performance history, and injury or fitness announcements affecting either player. Seeding changes, draw position shifts, or updates on playing conditions at the venue can also shift trader positioning. Media reports on mental state, coaching changes, or momentum from prior rounds often trigger repricing. Live match action—early set results or momentum swings—will drive the most volatile moves as traders update their beliefs in real time, potentially creating sharp divergences between prediction markets and sportsbook lines.