TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$133,388,117
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,436,095,462
405,232
Markets across
30,526
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,693
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 6, 6:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This event group covers the Wimbledon ATP tennis match between Kyrian Jacquet and Vilius Gaubas, originally scheduled for June 29, 2026. Markets track both the match winner and whether the match is completed through normal play, with resolution dependent on official ATP Tour records and credible reporting.
This market refers to the tennis match between Kyrian Jacquet and Vilius Gaubas in the Wimbledon ATP, originally scheduled for June 29, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Kyrian Jacquet' if Kyrian Jacquet advances against Vilius Gaubas. This market will resolve to 'Vilius Gaubas' if Vilius Gaubas advances against Kyrian Jacquet. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market will resolve to "Kyrian Jacquet" if Kyrian Jacquet defeats Vilius Gaubas in their Wimbledon match originally scheduled for June 29, 2026, 09:03 UTC. It will resolve to "Vilius Gaubas" if Vilius Gaubas defeats Kyrian Jacquet. For the purposes of this market, a player officially declared the winner of the match will be considered to have defeated the opponent, including in cases of walkover, retirement, withdrawal, default, or disqualification.
Polymarket and Limitless can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, liquidity pools, and fee structures, which can create temporary price gaps. Polymarket and Limitless may also have slightly different user bases with varying information access or risk appetites. Arbitrage traders typically exploit these spreads, but friction costs—withdrawal delays, platform fees, and slippage on smaller volumes—can prevent prices from converging instantly. Market depth also varies: one platform may have deeper liquidity at certain price levels, allowing larger trades to move the odds differently. These gaps usually narrow as resolution approaches and traders seek to lock in profits.