TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$141,541,542
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,440,096,988
406,065
Markets across
30,522
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,692
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 10, 6:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This event group covers a professional tennis match between Jannik Sinner and Jenson Brooksby scheduled for the 2026 Wimbledon ATP Men's Singles Round of 32 on July 3, 2026. The group contains three related markets: one tracking whether Set 2 is completed (Kalshi), one determining match winner/advancement (Polymarket), and one confirming full match completion (Polymarket).
This market refers to the tennis match between Jannik Sinner and Jenson Brooksby in the Wimbledon ATP, originally scheduled for July 3, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Jannik Sinner' if Jannik Sinner advances against Jenson Brooksby. This market will resolve to 'Jenson Brooksby' if Jenson Brooksby advances against Jannik Sinner. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
The market resolves Yes if either Jannik Sinner or Jenson Brooksby wins set 2 of their 2026 Wimbledon Men's Singles Round of 32 match. If the match does not occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation, the market resolves to fair price. If the match is postponed or delayed, the market remains open until the rescheduled match concludes within two weeks. If a player retires, markets that can be unconditionally settled based on completed play resolve accordingly; those that cannot are resolved to fair market price at the Exchange's discretion.
Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform operates under distinct rule sets, liquidity profiles, and user demographics. Kalshi's binary contract structure and regulatory framework may attract different traders than Polymarket's share-based model. Liquidity concentration, order-book depth, and the timing of large trades can cause temporary price gaps. Additionally, platform-specific fees, withdrawal policies, and settlement speed influence how aggressively traders position themselves. These structural differences mean identical match outcomes can trade at different implied probabilities across venues until arbitrageurs exploit the gap.
Key catalysts include recent form and head-to-head records, player injury reports or withdrawal announcements, court surface conditions at Wimbledon, and betting action from professional syndicates. Odds typically shift sharply following official lineup confirmations, warm-up tournament results, or credible injury updates. Social media sentiment and expert commentary can also drive retail trader positioning. As the match date approaches, late-breaking news—such as illness, equipment issues, or unexpected roster changes—often triggers rapid repricing. Monitoring sports news and platform order flow helps traders anticipate and react to these moves.