TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$126,324,530

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,434,646,834

406,019

Markets across

30,401

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,689

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool
kalshi
polymarket

Who will win Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool?

Volume:
$25,024

Julian Cash / Lloyd Glasspool

all

2 markets

Kalshi

Polymarket

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 3, 2026

Closed: Jul 3, 8:00 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Julian Cash / Lloyd Glasspool

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$11,630
N/A
N/A
$11,187
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,734
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool Set 1 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$252
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool Total Sets: O/U 2.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$111
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool Match O/U 21.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool Match O/U 22.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool Set 1 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool Set 2 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool Set 2 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool Set 1 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$20
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Corentin Moutet / Arthur Reymond

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$11,055
N/A
N/A
$10,775
Settled
No
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool Set Handicap +/-1.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$48
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool Match O/U 23.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool Set 1 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool Set Handicap +/-1.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool Set 2 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Moutet/Reymond vs Cash/Glasspool Set 2 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 18

Description

This event group covers a professional doubles tennis match between Corentin Moutet/Arthur Reymond and Julian Cash/Lloyd Glasspool scheduled for the 2026 Wimbledon Men's Doubles Round of 32 on July 3, 2026 at 6:00 AM ET. The markets track both match completion and match winner outcomes across two prediction platforms.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi focuses on match winner determination after any ball is played, while Polymarket distinguishes between match completion (strict normal play requirement) and match winner (allows advancement via retirement/default). Kalshi does not explicitly address forfeits, retirements, or cancellations, creating ambiguity in edge cases.Hero tip: Kalshi's winner-only focus creates resolution risk if the match is abandoned or a player retires before completion. Polymarket's dual-market structure is more granular: the completion market is strict (NO on any non-completion), while the winner market is flexible (YES to advancing team on retirement). If retirement is a realistic scenario, short Kalshi and long Polymarket completion market for downside protection.

Critical divergence points:

  • Kalshi: Binary YES resolution if either team wins after a ball is played. No explicit handling of cancellations, forfeits, retirements, or delays. Assumes match will be played and resolved by normal completion or does not address these scenarios. Key Quote: 'If [team] wins the...professional tennis match...after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.'
  • Polymarket (Completion Market): Resolves YES only if match is completed under normal play through all required games and sets. Resolves NO for forfeit, retirement, walkover, cancellation, tie, or delay beyond 7 days without winner. Strict completion requirement. Key Quote: 'This market will resolve to No if the match is not completed for any reason.'
  • Polymarket (Winner Market): Resolves to advancing team name if match begins but incomplete due to opponent retirement, default, or disqualification. Resolves 50-50 for walkover (pre-match withdrawal), cancellation, tie, or 7+ day delay. More flexible than completion market. Key Quote: 'If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances.'
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the doubles tennis match between Moutet/Reymond and Cash/Glasspool in the Wimbledon ATP, originally scheduled for July 3, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Moutet/Reymond' if the team of Moutet/Reymond advances against Cash/Glasspool. This market will resolve to 'Cash/Glasspool' if the team of Cash/Glasspool advances against Moutet/Reymond. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (a team withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Kalshi

If Corentin Moutet / Arthur Reymond wins the Moutet / Reymond vs Cash / Glasspool professional tennis match in the 2026 Wimbledon Men Doubles Round Of 32 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes. If Julian Cash / Lloyd Glasspool wins the Moutet / Reymond vs Cash / Glasspool professional tennis match in the 2026 Wimbledon Men Doubles Round Of 32 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price outcomes differently because they operate under distinct regulatory and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets reflect pure trader belief through continuous order-book pricing. This market's odds on Polymarket and Kalshi may diverge from major sportsbooks because traders have different risk tolerances and information sets. Prediction market prices often react faster to breaking news or player updates, making them useful for comparing against fixed sportsbook lines. Neither is inherently more accurate, but the comparison reveals where smart money is positioning itself.

Polymarket and Kalshi operate under different regulatory frameworks and attract distinct trader demographics, which can create temporary price gaps. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Liquidity depth, fee structures, and user interface design also influence how quickly each platform's order book reflects new information. One platform may see a surge of informed traders earlier than the other, or casual traders on one venue may price the outcome differently than professionals on another. These spreads typically narrow as the match date approaches and arbitrageurs exploit the difference, but they can persist if one platform has significantly higher volume or different settlement rules.