TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$126,324,530
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,434,646,834
406,019
Markets across
30,401
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,689
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 3, 8:00 AM EST
Kalshi
This event group covers a professional doubles tennis match between Corentin Moutet/Arthur Reymond and Julian Cash/Lloyd Glasspool scheduled for the 2026 Wimbledon Men's Doubles Round of 32 on July 3, 2026 at 6:00 AM ET. The markets track both match completion and match winner outcomes across two prediction platforms.
This market refers to the doubles tennis match between Moutet/Reymond and Cash/Glasspool in the Wimbledon ATP, originally scheduled for July 3, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Moutet/Reymond' if the team of Moutet/Reymond advances against Cash/Glasspool. This market will resolve to 'Cash/Glasspool' if the team of Cash/Glasspool advances against Moutet/Reymond. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (a team withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
If Corentin Moutet / Arthur Reymond wins the Moutet / Reymond vs Cash / Glasspool professional tennis match in the 2026 Wimbledon Men Doubles Round Of 32 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes. If Julian Cash / Lloyd Glasspool wins the Moutet / Reymond vs Cash / Glasspool professional tennis match in the 2026 Wimbledon Men Doubles Round Of 32 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.
Polymarket and Kalshi operate under different regulatory frameworks and attract distinct trader demographics, which can create temporary price gaps. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Liquidity depth, fee structures, and user interface design also influence how quickly each platform's order book reflects new information. One platform may see a surge of informed traders earlier than the other, or casual traders on one venue may price the outcome differently than professionals on another. These spreads typically narrow as the match date approaches and arbitrageurs exploit the difference, but they can persist if one platform has significantly higher volume or different settlement rules.