TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$141,541,542

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,440,096,988

406,065

Markets across

30,522

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,692

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis
kalshi
polymarket

Who will win Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis?

Volume:
$26,098

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis

 - Polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 3, 2026

Closed: Jul 10, 6:00 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$8,246
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Marcelo Arevalo / Mate Pavic

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$5,280
N/A
N/A
$3,666
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis Match O/U 23.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$48
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis Match O/U 22.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis Set 2 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis Set 2 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis Set 2 O/U 10.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis Total Sets: O/U 2.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis Set 1 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
18.9¢
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

David Stevenson / Marcus Willis

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$12,215
N/A
N/A
$11,815
Settled
No
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis Set 1 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$46
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis Set Handicap +/-1.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis Set 1 O/U 8.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$20
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis Set 1 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$20
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis Set 2 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$8
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis Set Handicap +/-1.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$2
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Wimbledon ATP (Doubles): Arevalo/Pavic vs Stevenson/Willis Match O/U 21.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 18

Description

This event group covers a Wimbledon ATP Men's Doubles match between Arevalo/Pavic and Stevenson/Willis scheduled for July 3, 2026. The markets track both match completion and match outcome across two platforms with materially different resolution criteria.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Polymarket's completion market and outcome market have conflicting retirement/default treatment, and Kalshi's broader 'after a ball is played' standard diverges from Polymarket's strict completion requirement. This creates three distinct resolution pathways for the same underlying event.Hero tip: Identify which Polymarket contract you hold: 'Completed Match' (strict, excludes retirements) or 'Outcome' (flexible, includes retirements if one team advances). Kalshi traders should note that retirements after play begins will likely resolve Yes, whereas Polymarket's completion market would resolve No. Monitor for early withdrawals or injury news before match start.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket - Completed Match: Resolves Yes only if match reaches natural completion through normal play. Any forfeit, retirement, default, walkover, cancellation, tie, or 7+ day delay without winner resolves to No. Source: official ATP statistics or credible consensus within 2 hours of conclusion.
  • Polymarket - Outcome Market: Resolves to the advancing team if match begins but one team retires, defaults, or is disqualified. Walkovers (pre-match withdrawal) resolve to 50-50. Cancellations, ties, or 7+ day delays resolve to 50-50. Source: official ATP Tour information or credible consensus.
  • Kalshi: Resolves Yes if either team wins after a ball has been played. No explicit exclusion for retirements, defaults, or other forfeits. Simpler binary structure with no intermediate outcomes specified.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the doubles tennis match between Arevalo/Pavic and Stevenson/Willis in the Wimbledon ATP, originally scheduled for July 3, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Arevalo/Pavic' if the team of Arevalo/Pavic advances against Stevenson/Willis. This market will resolve to 'Stevenson/Willis' if the team of Stevenson/Willis advances against Arevalo/Pavic. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (a team withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Kalshi

Resolution requires that a ball be played in the Arevalo / Pavic vs Stevenson / Willis match at 2026 Wimbledon Men's Doubles Round of 32. The market resolves to Yes for whichever team wins the match after play has commenced. If the match does not occur before it starts due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or other cancellation, the market resolves to a fair price per standard rules. Postponements or delays do not close the market; it remains open and closes only after the rescheduled match concludes, provided this occurs within two weeks.

Frequently asked questions

This dashboard aggregates trader positions on the Wimbledon ATP Doubles final across Polymarket and Kalshi, capturing real-time consensus on whether Arevalo and Pavic will defeat Stevenson and Willis in this matchup. Prediction markets like these reflect collective intelligence from thousands of traders pricing the outcome based on player form, head-to-head records, court conditions, and injury status. By monitoring both platforms simultaneously, you gain visibility into how odds shift as new information emerges—from pre-match analysis through final result confirmation. The cross-platform view reveals whether consensus is tight or divergent, helping you spot arbitrage opportunities or validate your own assessment of the pairing's chances.

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price outcomes using different mechanisms. Sportsbooks employ oddsmakers and risk management to set lines, then adjust based on betting volume and liability. Prediction markets, by contrast, rely on continuous trader-to-trader matching and automated market makers, allowing prices to update in real time as new information surfaces. This market often reflects faster reactions to breaking news—injuries, weather, or tactical shifts—because traders profit directly from accurate pricing. Sportsbook odds may lag slightly behind prediction market consensus, or diverge if the book is managing liability differently. Comparing both sources helps you identify mispricings and refine your edge.

Polymarket and Kalshi operate under different regulatory frameworks, liquidity pools, and user bases, which can create pricing gaps on the same event. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Kalshi's order-book model may attract institutional traders seeking tighter spreads, while Polymarket's automated market maker can experience slippage during volatile periods. Differences in platform fees, settlement timelines, and trader demographics also influence how each platform prices the Arevalo–Pavic versus Stevenson–Willis outcome. Monitoring both simultaneously reveals arbitrage signals: if one platform significantly underprices or overprices a pairing, traders can exploit the gap by taking opposing positions across venues.

Several catalysts can shift odds before the match begins. Injury announcements or withdrawal news involving any of the four players would trigger immediate repricing. Recent tournament performance, ranking changes, or head-to-head records becoming public can sway trader sentiment. Court surface conditions, weather forecasts, and draw positioning also influence doubles dynamics. Betting syndicates or sharp money flowing into one side may signal informed conviction, prompting retail traders to follow. Media coverage highlighting one pairing's form or chemistry can amplify momentum. Watch for late-breaking lineup confirmations, coaching changes, or partner chemistry updates—these often move prediction markets faster than traditional sportsbooks.