TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$141,541,542
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,440,096,988
406,065
Markets across
30,522
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,692
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 10, 6:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This event group covers a Wimbledon ATP Men's Doubles match between Arevalo/Pavic and Stevenson/Willis scheduled for July 3, 2026. The markets track both match completion and match outcome across two platforms with materially different resolution criteria.
This market refers to the doubles tennis match between Arevalo/Pavic and Stevenson/Willis in the Wimbledon ATP, originally scheduled for July 3, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Arevalo/Pavic' if the team of Arevalo/Pavic advances against Stevenson/Willis. This market will resolve to 'Stevenson/Willis' if the team of Stevenson/Willis advances against Arevalo/Pavic. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (a team withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolution requires that a ball be played in the Arevalo / Pavic vs Stevenson / Willis match at 2026 Wimbledon Men's Doubles Round of 32. The market resolves to Yes for whichever team wins the match after play has commenced. If the match does not occur before it starts due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or other cancellation, the market resolves to a fair price per standard rules. Postponements or delays do not close the market; it remains open and closes only after the rescheduled match concludes, provided this occurs within two weeks.
Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price outcomes using different mechanisms. Sportsbooks employ oddsmakers and risk management to set lines, then adjust based on betting volume and liability. Prediction markets, by contrast, rely on continuous trader-to-trader matching and automated market makers, allowing prices to update in real time as new information surfaces. This market often reflects faster reactions to breaking news—injuries, weather, or tactical shifts—because traders profit directly from accurate pricing. Sportsbook odds may lag slightly behind prediction market consensus, or diverge if the book is managing liability differently. Comparing both sources helps you identify mispricings and refine your edge.
Polymarket and Kalshi operate under different regulatory frameworks, liquidity pools, and user bases, which can create pricing gaps on the same event. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Kalshi's order-book model may attract institutional traders seeking tighter spreads, while Polymarket's automated market maker can experience slippage during volatile periods. Differences in platform fees, settlement timelines, and trader demographics also influence how each platform prices the Arevalo–Pavic versus Stevenson–Willis outcome. Monitoring both simultaneously reveals arbitrage signals: if one platform significantly underprices or overprices a pairing, traders can exploit the gap by taking opposing positions across venues.
Several catalysts can shift odds before the match begins. Injury announcements or withdrawal news involving any of the four players would trigger immediate repricing. Recent tournament performance, ranking changes, or head-to-head records becoming public can sway trader sentiment. Court surface conditions, weather forecasts, and draw positioning also influence doubles dynamics. Betting syndicates or sharp money flowing into one side may signal informed conviction, prompting retail traders to follow. Media coverage highlighting one pairing's form or chemistry can amplify momentum. Watch for late-breaking lineup confirmations, coaching changes, or partner chemistry updates—these often move prediction markets faster than traditional sportsbooks.