TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$126,324,530
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,434,646,834
406,019
Markets across
30,401
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,689
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jun 27, 3:09 PM EST
Kalshi
This market tracks the outcome and details of the UFC Fight Night lightweight main card bout between Rafael Fiziev and Manuel Torres scheduled for June 27, 2026. Aggregated data from Polymarket and Kalshi shows a 100.0% consensus probability, with resolution sourced from UFC.com official event records. Markets span fight winner, method of victory including knockout/technical knockout and submission, round thresholds, and performance bonuses. Watch for the fight's conclusion on June 27, 2026, which will determine all related market resolutions.
This market will resolve to "Rafael Fiziev" if Rafael Fiziev is officially declared the winner of the fight against Manuel Torres at UFC Fight Night: Fiziev vs. Torres, scheduled for June 27, 2026. It will resolve to "Manuel Torres" if Manuel Torres is officially declared the winner. If the fight is declared a draw or technical draw, ruled a No Contest, not scored, canceled, or postponed beyond July 11, 2026, this market will resolve "50-50." The resolution source for this market will be official information from the UFC.
This market covers the professional MMA fight between Rafael Fiziev and Manuel Torres originally scheduled for June 27, 2026. Resolution depends on the fight's official outcome: if Fiziev wins, that market resolves to Yes; if Torres wins, that market resolves to Yes. If the fight is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled fight concludes within two weeks. In the event of a tie or no contest, both fighter markets resolve to 50/50. Should the fight be cancelled or rescheduled more than two weeks away, the market resolves to a fair price in accordance with established rules.
Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Platform design, user demographics, and liquidity pools shape how each venue prices the same fight. Polymarket and Kalshi attract different trader bases—some prefer one platform's interface, fee structure, or regulatory framework. Liquidity imbalances mean a large order on one platform can move the price more sharply than on the other. Additionally, each platform's rules and settlement processes may be perceived differently by traders, leading some to demand a risk premium. These gaps typically narrow as arbitrageurs exploit them, but they can persist if transaction costs or platform friction outweigh the profit opportunity.
Fighter news—injury reports, training camp updates, or withdrawal announcements—can shift odds sharply. Weigh-in results and official fighter statements often trigger repricing as traders assess physical condition and mental readiness. Betting action from professional syndicates or sharp money may signal confidence in one side and attract retail traders to follow. Media coverage, analyst commentary, and social sentiment can also influence perception. Finally, any rule changes, venue adjustments, or opponent substitutions announced by the UFC would prompt immediate recalibration across this market and sportsbooks alike.