TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$126,324,530
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,434,646,834
406,019
Markets across
30,401
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,689
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jun 27, 1:59 PM EST
Kalshi
This event group covers a UFC lightweight bout between Nazim Sadykhov and Matheus Camilo scheduled for June 27, 2026, at UFC Fight Night: Fiziev vs. Torres. Markets span multiple outcome dimensions: winner determination, method of victory (KO/TKO, submission, decision), fight duration (round thresholds), and distance completion.
This market will resolve to "Nazim Sadykhov" if Nazim Sadykhov is officially declared the winner of the fight against Matheus Camilo at UFC Fight Night: Fiziev vs. Torres, scheduled for June 27, 2026. It will resolve to "Matheus Camilo" if Matheus Camilo is officially declared the winner. If the fight is declared a draw or technical draw, ruled a No Contest, not scored, canceled, or postponed beyond July 11, 2026, this market will resolve "50-50." The resolution source for this market will be official information from the UFC.
This market covers the professional MMA fight between Nazim Sadykhov and Matheus Camilo originally scheduled for June 27, 2026. Resolution depends on the fight's official outcome: if Sadykhov wins, that market resolves to Yes; if Camilo wins, that market resolves to Yes. If the fight is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled fight concludes within two weeks. In the event of a tie or no contest, both fighter markets resolve to 50/50. Should the fight be cancelled or rescheduled more than two weeks away, the market resolves to a fair price in accordance with established rules.
Prediction markets like these operate on continuous trading rather than fixed odds, meaning prices shift dynamically as new information emerges and traders adjust positions. Unlike traditional sportsbooks, which set and manage lines to balance action, prediction markets reflect live consensus probability. This often results in tighter spreads and faster price discovery, though sportsbook odds may incorporate additional factors like sharp action or liability management that differ from pure crowd sentiment.
Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, liquidity pools, and regulatory frameworks, which can lead to temporary price gaps. Polymarket and Kalshi may also have distinct market structures—one might emphasize binary outcomes while the other frames the question differently—causing subtle shifts in how traders interpret and price the same event. Arbitrage opportunities between platforms typically narrow these gaps over time as traders exploit mispricings.