TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$133,388,117
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,436,095,462
405,232
Markets across
30,526
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,693
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jun 27, 1:00 PM EST
Kalshi
This market tracks whether the UFC middleweight bout between Ikram Aliskerov and Brunno Ferreira scheduled for June 27, 2026, will go the full distance or end early. Aggregated data from Polymarket and Kalshi currently shows 100.0% consensus probability for the fight going the distance, based on official UFC event records as the resolution source. Watch for fight announcements or fighter injury updates leading up to the June 27 event date, as these could shift market expectations around fight duration and early stoppage likelihood.
This market will resolve to "Ikram Aliskerov" if Ikram Aliskerov is officially declared the winner of the fight against Brunno Ferreira at UFC Fight Night: Fiziev vs. Torres, scheduled for June 27, 2026. It will resolve to "Brunno Ferreira" if Brunno Ferreira is officially declared the winner. If the fight is declared a draw or technical draw, ruled a No Contest, not scored, canceled, or postponed beyond July 11, 2026, this market will resolve "50-50." The resolution source for this market will be official information from the UFC.
This market covers the professional MMA fight between Ikram Aliskerov and Brunno Ferreira originally scheduled for June 27, 2026. Resolution depends on the fight's official outcome: if Aliskerov wins, that market resolves to Yes; if Ferreira wins, that market resolves to Yes. If the fight is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled fight concludes within two weeks. In the event of a tie or no contest, both fighter markets resolve to 50/50. Should the fight be cancelled or rescheduled more than two weeks away, the market resolves to a fair price in accordance with established rules.
Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Platform differences in liquidity, user demographics, and market design can create temporary price gaps. Polymarket uses an automated market maker model, which may price outcomes differently than Kalshi's order-book structure during low-volume periods. Additionally, each platform attracts distinct trader bases with varying risk appetites and information access. Arbitrage opportunities between the two venues can persist if transaction costs or withdrawal delays make cross-platform trading inefficient, allowing savvy traders to exploit mispricings on either side.
Fighter news—injury reports, weight-cut complications, or withdrawal announcements—can trigger sharp repricing on both platforms. Weigh-in results and official fighter statements often spark volatility as traders reassess physical condition and mental readiness. Social media activity, training camp updates, and analyst commentary may shift sentiment gradually. Closer to fight day, late-breaking developments like venue changes or rule adjustments could accelerate moves. Real-time fight footage or commentary during the event itself will drive final adjustments before this market locks and resolves.