TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$126,324,530
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,434,646,834
406,019
Markets across
30,401
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,689
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jun 27, 12:04 PM EST
Kalshi
This market tracks the duration of the UFC Fight Night preliminary welterweight bout between Eric Nolan and Farman Hasanov, specifically whether the fight will conclude within 2.5 rounds or extend beyond that threshold. The aggregated consensus across Kalshi and Polymarket stands at 99.9% for the over/under 2.5 rounds outcome. Resolution will be determined by official UFC records at ufc.com/events. Watch for the fight's scheduled date of June 27, 2026, when the bout takes place and the round count will be officially recorded.
This market will resolve to "Eric Nolan" if Eric Nolan is officially declared the winner of the fight against Farman Hasanov at UFC Fight Night: Fiziev vs. Torres, scheduled for June 27, 2026. It will resolve to "Farman Hasanov" if Farman Hasanov is officially declared the winner. If the fight is declared a draw or technical draw, ruled a No Contest, not scored, canceled, or postponed beyond July 11, 2026, this market will resolve "50-50." The resolution source for this market will be official information from the UFC.
This market covers the professional MMA fight between Farman Hasanov and Eric Nolan originally scheduled for June 27, 2026. Resolution depends on the fight's official outcome: if Hasanov wins, that market resolves to Yes; if Nolan wins, that market resolves to Yes. If the fight is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled fight concludes within two weeks. In the event of a tie or no contest, both fighter markets resolve to 50/50. Should the fight be cancelled or rescheduled more than two weeks away, the market resolves to a fair price in accordance with established rules.
Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, fee structures, and regulatory frameworks. Polymarket uses an automated market maker model that can reward early movers and arbitrageurs, while Kalshi employs a traditional order-book design favoring institutional participation. Liquidity depth, user geography, and platform-specific incentives all influence how quickly new information gets priced in. A fighter injury announcement or media narrative shift may ripple through one venue faster than the other, creating temporary spreads that savvy traders can exploit before consensus realigns.
Fighter injury announcements, training camp updates, and weight-cut complications are primary catalysts that shift odds dramatically. Social media activity, analyst commentary, and betting action on external sportsbooks can also influence trader sentiment here. Lineup changes, opponent substitutions, or late-notice rule adjustments would trigger sharp repricing. Additionally, if either fighter gains or loses notable public support through recent performances or media coverage, this market will reflect that shift in real time. Close monitoring of MMA news outlets and official UFC communications is essential for staying ahead of market moves.