TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$133,388,117
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,436,095,462
405,232
Markets across
30,526
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,693
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Aug 29, 3:39 AM EST
Kalshi
This market tracks whether the UFC Fight Night bout between Ding Meng and Cameron Nelson will last over or under 2.5 rounds. The aggregated consensus probability for the leading outcome, O/U 2.5 Rounds, is currently 100.0% across Kalshi and Polymarket. The result will be determined by the official UFC announcement. Watch for the scheduled fight date on August 29, 2026, as it will confirm whether the bout proceeds and impacts the market outcome.
This market will resolve to "Ding Meng" if Ding Meng is officially declared the winner of the fight against Cameron Nelson at UFC Fight Night: Nurmagomedov vs. Song, scheduled for August 29, 2026. It will resolve to "Cameron Nelson" if Cameron Nelson is officially declared the winner. If the fight is declared a draw or technical draw, ruled a No Contest, not scored, canceled, or postponed beyond September 12, 2026, this market will resolve "50-50." The resolution source for this market will be official information from the UFC.
The market resolves according to the outcome of the Meng vs Nelson professional MMA fight originally scheduled for August 29, 2026. Should the fight be postponed or delayed, the market stays open until the rescheduled fight finishes, as long as it occurs within two weeks of the original date. A tie or no contest results in a 50/50 resolution for both fighters. If the fight is cancelled or rescheduled beyond two weeks from the original date, the market resolves at a fair price per the rules. These markets are not endorsed by Zuffa LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship, UFC, and any mention of UFC is for descriptive purposes only.
On Polymarket, this market leans heavily toward one outcome, while Kalshi shows a more balanced distribution. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Such gaps often arise from differences in user bases, liquidity depth, and how each platform weights new information. For example, a surge in social media buzz around a specific fighter could drive Polymarket prices sharply before Kalshi traders react. Additionally, varying fee structures and market design choices can amplify or dampen price movements, especially in lower-volume events like this one.