TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$126,324,530

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,434,646,834

406,019

Markets across

30,401

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,689

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
UFC Fight Night: Abus Magomedov vs. Michal Oleksiejczuk (Middleweight, Main Card)
kalshi
polymarket

UFC Fight Night: Abus Magomedov vs. Michal Oleksiejczuk (Middleweight, Main Card)

Volume:
$1,510,662

Abus Magomedov vs. Michal Oleksiejczuk

all

2 markets

Polymarket

Kalshi

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 27, 2026

Closed: Jun 27, 11:59 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Abus Magomedov vs. Michal Oleksiejczuk

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$507,842
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Abusupiyan Magomedov

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$475,506
N/A
N/A
$397,991
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Fight won by submission?

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$467
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

O/U 0.5 Rounds

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.9¢
N/A
$61
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Michal Oleksiejczuk

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$393,439
N/A
N/A
$351,507
Settled
No
polymarket

O/U 1.5 Rounds

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$118,381
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Fight to Go the Distance?

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$9,160
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

O/U 2.5 Rounds

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$4,909
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Magomedov to win by KO/TKO?

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$353
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Fight won by KO/TKO?

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$337
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Oleksiejczuk to win by KO/TKO?

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$207
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 11

Intro

This market tracks whether the UFC middleweight bout between Abus Magomedov and Michal Oleksiejczuk will extend beyond the first half-round. Aggregated data from Kalshi and Polymarket shows 96.0% consensus probability that the fight goes over 0.5 rounds, meaning it will last longer than 30 seconds. The resolution source is the official UFC events database. Watch for the fight's scheduled date of June 27, 2026, at UFC Fight Night: Fiziev vs. Torres to see whether this fast-finish prediction holds.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Polymarket provides comprehensive, multi-market coverage with explicit edge-case resolution (draws, no contests, postponements); Kalshi market is structurally incomplete and lacks method-of-victory granularity and edge-case definitions.Hero tip: Use Polymarket as the primary reference for this event. Kalshi's binary yes/no structure does not align with Polymarket's detailed outcome taxonomy. If trading on Kalshi, explicitly confirm how the platform handles draws, technical decisions, and cancellations before committing capital.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Comprehensive market suite: (1) Fight Winner (Magomedov vs Oleksiejczuk vs 50-50 on draw/no contest/postponement beyond July 11); (2) KO/TKO Yes/No; (3) Michal KO/TKO Yes/No; (4) Submission Yes/No; (5-7) Round duration thresholds (O/U 0.5, 1.5, 2.5 rounds); (8) Distance (Yes if judges' decision after full rounds). All markets resolve 50-50 on draw, no contest, or postponement beyond July 11, 2026. Resolution source: Official UFC information.
  • Kalshi: Single binary market: Yes if Abusupiyan Magomedov wins OR if Michal Oleksiejczuk wins. No explicit handling of draws, no contests, disqualifications, or cancellations. No method-of-victory markets. Resolution source not specified.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market will resolve to "Abus Magomedov" if Abus Magomedov is officially declared the winner of the fight against Michal Oleksiejczuk at UFC Fight Night: Fiziev vs. Torres, scheduled for June 27, 2026. It will resolve to "Michal Oleksiejczuk" if Michal Oleksiejczuk is officially declared the winner. If the fight is declared a draw or technical draw, ruled a No Contest, not scored, canceled, or postponed beyond July 11, 2026, this market will resolve "50-50." The resolution source for this market will be official information from the UFC.

Kalshi

This market covers the professional MMA fight between Abusupiyan Magomedov and Michal Oleksiejczuk originally scheduled for June 27, 2026. Resolution depends on the fight's official outcome: if Magomedov wins, that market resolves to Yes; if Oleksiejczuk wins, that market resolves to Yes. If the fight is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled fight concludes within two weeks. In the event of a tie or no contest, both fighter markets resolve to 50/50. Should the fight be cancelled or rescheduled more than two weeks away, the market resolves to a fair price in accordance with established rules.

Frequently asked questions

This dashboard aggregates prediction market pricing for the Magomedov vs. Oleksiejczuk fight across Polymarket and Kalshi, allowing you to monitor consensus odds in real time. Traders on each platform independently price the likelihood of outcomes, creating a cross-platform view of how the market perceives this middleweight matchup. You can track shifts in trader conviction, compare pricing between venues, and see which outcomes command the strongest support as fight day approaches.

Prediction markets like these operate on peer-to-peer trading rather than fixed lines set by oddsmakers. Sportsbooks manage risk through margin and limits, while prediction markets reflect live consensus from many traders with real money at stake. This often produces tighter, more responsive pricing—especially as new information emerges. However, sportsbooks may offer deeper liquidity and faster settlement in some cases. Both sources are useful for comparing market sentiment, though they operate under different incentive structures.

Polymarket and Kalshi attract different trader bases, regulatory frameworks, and liquidity pools, which naturally creates pricing divergence. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Differences may also reflect varying levels of activity at any given moment—one platform may see heavier trading volume or more recent information flow than the other. These gaps typically narrow as the event date approaches and arbitrage traders exploit mispricings, but temporary spreads are normal and can signal where informed traders are concentrating their positions.

Fighter news—injuries, training updates, or public statements—typically drives sharp moves in this market. Weigh-in results, recent performance footage, or changes to fight card status can shift trader positioning significantly. Betting line movements at major sportsbooks often precede or mirror prediction market shifts. Social media momentum, analyst commentary, and any last-minute rule or venue changes may also trigger repricing. Close to fight day, late-breaking information tends to produce the most volatile swings.