TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$126,324,530
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,434,646,834
406,019
Markets across
30,401
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,689
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 11, 11:19 PM EST
Kalshi
This market tracks the outcome and method of victory in the UFC 329 lightweight main card bout between Paddy Pimblett and Benoît Saint Denis, aggregating consensus data from Polymarket and Kalshi against official UFC.com records. The leading outcome currently sits at 100.0%, reflecting the certainty that this scheduled event will take place. Watch for any official UFC announcements regarding fighter status or bout confirmation as the July 11, 2026 fight date approaches.
This market will resolve to "Paddy Pimblett" if Paddy Pimblett is officially declared the winner of the fight against Benoît Saint Denis at UFC 329: McGregor vs. Holloway 2, scheduled for July 11, 2026. It will resolve to "Benoît Saint Denis" if Benoît Saint Denis is officially declared the winner. If the fight is declared a draw or technical draw, ruled a No Contest, not scored, canceled, or postponed beyond July 25, 2026, this market will resolve "50-50." The resolution source for this market will be official information from the UFC.
Resolution depends on the fight outcome occurring on or shortly after the originally scheduled date of July 11, 2026. If the fight is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled bout concludes within two weeks. In the event of a tie or no contest, both fighters receive a 50/50 split resolution. Should the fight be cancelled or rescheduled beyond two weeks from the original date, the market resolves to a fair price in accordance with established rules.
Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Platform design, user base, and liquidity pools shape how each venue prices the same event. Polymarket attracts global traders with lower barriers to entry, while Kalshi operates under U.S. regulatory frameworks and draws a different demographic. Funding mechanisms, fee structures, and order-book depth also vary, meaning one platform may react faster to new information than the other. Additionally, each platform's user base may hold different conviction levels on the fighters' matchup, creating temporary price gaps. These spreads typically narrow closer to the event as arbitrageurs exploit discrepancies.