TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$141,541,542

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,440,096,988

406,065

Markets across

30,522

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,692

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Udinese Calcio vs. Como 1907 - More Markets
polymarket
predict

What is the result of Udinese Calcio vs Como 1907?

Volume:
$264,411

Both Teams to Score

all

2 markets

Polymarket

Predict

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Aug 22, 2026

Closed: Aug 22, 2:50 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Both Teams to Score

View
100%
53%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$40,879
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
predict

Both Teams to Score

View
40%
7%
Yes 40¢No 60¢
—
$19,800
$31
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

1st Half O/U 0.5

View
100%
34%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$25,332
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

O/U 1.5

View
100%
31%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$10,440
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
predict

O/U 1.5

View
72%
1%
Yes 72¢No 28¢
—
$19,867
$254
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

O/U 0.5

View
100%
10%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$8,788
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
predict

O/U 0.5

View
93%
2%
Yes 93¢No 7¢
—
$19,800
$439
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Udinese Calcio 1st Half O/U 0.5

View
100%
69%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$226
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Como 1907 O/U 0.5

View
100%
21%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$214
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Udinese Calcio O/U 0.5

View
100%
41%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$14
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

2nd Half O/U 0.5

View
100%
21%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Como 1907 2nd Half O/U 0.5

View
100%
22%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
predict

O/U 2.5

View
30%
14%
Yes 30¢No 70¢
—
$558
$1,206
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

O/U 2.5

View
0%
43%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$57,000
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
predict

Como 1907 (-1.5)

View
6%
22%
Yes 6¢No 94¢
—
$359
$865
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Como 1907 (-1.5)

View
0%
28%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$12,012
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
predict

O/U 3.5

View
1%
21%
Yes 1¢No 99¢
—
$298
$846
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

O/U 3.5

View
0%
22%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$8,679
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

O/U 4.5

View
0%
10%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$82,515
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
predict

O/U 4.5

View
N/A
N/A
—
$455
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Como 1907 (-2.5)

View
0%
11%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$4,470
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
predict

Como 1907 (-2.5)

View
N/A
N/A
—
$243
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

O/U 5.5

View
0%
4%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$4,139
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
predict

O/U 5.5

View
N/A
N/A
—
$455
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Como 1907 O/U 1.5

View
0%
46%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$2,398
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 25 of 44

Description

This group contains multiple markets for the upcoming Serie A match between Udinese Calcio and Como 1907, covering spread betting, total goals over/under thresholds, and both teams to score outcomes.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Unified Resolution Criteria (Consistent across platforms)

All markets across Polymarket and Predict use identical resolution logic tied to the official legaseriea.it score with consistent edge-case handling.Primary resolution logic: Official statistics from legaseriea.it, with credible reporting consensus as backup

Core resolution logic:

  • Resolve based on official final score from legaseriea.it within 90 minutes plus stoppage time
  • Postponed games stay open until completed; canceled games resolve 50-50
  • Use credible reporting consensus if official data unavailable within 2 hours post-match

Edge cases & clarifications:

  • Postponement: Market remains open until match is rescheduled and completed
  • Cancellation: Market resolves as 50-50 if no makeup game is scheduled
  • Incomplete Data: Use consensus of credible reporting if legaseriea.it fails to publish within 2 hours
Timing: Resolution occurs after official legaseriea.it publication, with 2-hour window for credible reporting fallbackOur PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

More markets for the Serie A game, scheduled for August 22 at 12:30 PM ET.

Predict

More markets for the Serie A game, scheduled for August 22 at 12:30 PM ET.

Frequently asked questions

The dashboard for the Udinese vs. Como match market aggregates real-time data from multiple prediction venues, showing how traders price the likelihood of different outcomes. It displays total volume of $264,411 and 24-hour volume of $260,794, letting users see where consensus lies across platforms. The view updates continuously, so you can monitor shifts in sentiment as the match approaches.

Prediction market odds reflect what traders are willing to pay now, often showing sharper or more nuanced views than traditional sportsbook lines. For this market, the decentralized nature of platforms like Polymarket and Predict means prices can diverge from sportsbooks, especially when new information emerges. Traders may react faster to injuries, weather updates, or form data, creating price gaps that sportsbooks lag behind.

On Polymarket and Predict, prices can vary because each venue has its own user base, liquidity, and trading dynamics. Polymarket and Predict can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. For example, one platform might attract more European fans who value recent domestic form, while another could reflect global bettors focusing on global player availability. These differences in participation and information flow naturally produce divergent odds across venues.