TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$141,541,542

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,440,096,988

406,065

Markets across

30,522

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,692

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
UB Alma Mater vs. LUA Gaming: Map 1
kalshi

Who will win UB Alma Mater vs. LUA Gaming Map 1?

Volume:
$19,566

LUA Gaming

 - Kalshi

LUA Gaming - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 21, 2026

Closed: Jul 21, 11:50 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

LUA Gaming

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$8,498
N/A
N/A
$6,116
Settled
Yes
kalshi

UB Alma Mater

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$11,068
N/A
N/A
$8,773
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

UB Alma Mater and LUA Gaming compete in the first map of their League of Legends match in the LES 2026 tournament on July 21, 2026. The winner of this individual map will be determined by standard competitive League of Legends gameplay rules.

Kalshi

Resolution depends on the outcome of map 1 in the scheduled LES 2026 match between UB Alma Mater and LUA Gaming on July 21, 2026 at 11:00 AM EDT. If the map is postponed and not completed within 48 hours of the originally scheduled start time, the market resolves to fair market price. If the match or map is cancelled before play begins, or if a match is forfeited before any play occurs, the market resolves to fair market price. If a map is forfeited before any play occurs within that map, the market resolves to fair market price. If a map begins and is subsequently forfeited, the market resolves according to the official result published by the governing body or tournament organizer.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the UB Alma Mater vs. LUA Gaming esports match tracks real-time odds and historical price movements as traders position themselves on the outcome of Map 1. You can monitor current market pricing, 24-hour volume of $14,264, and total volume of $19,566 to gauge trader conviction and liquidity. The interface displays how sentiment has shifted over time, helping you understand whether confidence in a particular outcome is growing or declining as the event approaches.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and manage risk, while prediction markets aggregate the beliefs of traders who have direct financial exposure to accuracy. This market aggregates real-money forecasts from participants betting on the actual outcome, which can reveal information gaps or consensus that traditional sportsbooks may not yet reflect. Comparing the two can highlight where the crowd sees value.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through continuous order-book trading, where buyers and sellers set the odds by placing bids and asks. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price you see represents the marginal trade—the last transaction—and moves as new information or trader sentiment emerges. Wider bid-ask spreads indicate lower liquidity or higher uncertainty, while tighter spreads suggest confidence and active participation. Real-time price discovery on the platform reflects the collective forecast of all active traders.

This market resolves around Jul 21, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. The resolution hinges on the official result of Map 1 between the two teams, as documented by the esports league or tournament organizer. Until that point, traders can buy and sell positions to adjust their exposure. Once the match concludes and the winner is officially announced, the market settles accordingly.

Several catalysts could shift odds before Jul 21, 2026. Roster changes, player injuries, or roster substitutions announced by either team would alter perceived strength. Recent tournament results, scrim outcomes, or public statements from coaches and players can reshape expectations. Meta shifts in the game itself—balance patches or map-specific strategy innovations—may favor one team over the other. Media coverage, expert analysis, and betting volume spikes can also accelerate price movement as new information reaches traders.