TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$103,397,351

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,410,176,180

399,592

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,622

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Tvaakers vs Ariana FC: Spread
kalshi

Tvaakers vs Ariana FC: Spread

Volume:
$1,403

Ariana FC wins by more than 2.5 goals

 - Kalshi

Ariana FC wins by more than 2.5 goals - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Sep 12, 2026

Closed: Sep 12, 12:02 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Ariana FC wins by more than 2.5 goals

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$493
N/A
N/A
$493
Settled
No
kalshi

Tvaakers wins by more than 2.5 goals

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$310
N/A
N/A
$310
Settled
No
kalshi

Tvaakers wins by more than 1.5 goals

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$300
N/A
N/A
$300
Settled
No
kalshi

Ariana FC wins by more than 1.5 goals

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$300
N/A
N/A
$300
Settled
No
Total markets: 4

Description

This event tracks the outcome of an Ettan soccer match between Tvaakers and Ariana FC, focusing on the margin of victory for either team. The resolution depends on whether the winning team achieves a specified goal differential threshold within regular time, excluding extra time or penalties.

Kalshi

The event evaluates different goal-differential thresholds for determining a winner in the Tvaakers vs Ariana FC Ettan soccer match scheduled for September 12, 2026. Four distinct primary rules define specific victory margins: Tvaakers winning by more than 2.5 goals, Tvaakers winning by more than 1.5 goals, Ariana FC winning by more than 1.5 goals, and Ariana FC winning by more than 2.5 goals. All outcomes are assessed after 90 minutes of regular play plus any stoppage time, with extra time and penalty shootouts excluded from consideration. The event uses these varied thresholds to offer multiple perspectives on the potential margin of victory for either team, allowing participants to assess the likelihood of different scoreline scenarios within normal match duration.