TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$103,397,351

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,410,176,180

399,592

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,622

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Tunisia vs. Nigeria
polymarket
kalshi

What is the result of Tunisia vs. Nigeria?

Volume:
$64,511

Nigeria

 - Kalshi

Nigeria - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 2, 2026

Closed: Jul 2, 10:05 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Nigeria

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$25,403
N/A
N/A
$17,851
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Tunisia

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$33,080
N/A
N/A
$20,858
Settled
No
polymarket

Tunisia vs. Nigeria

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$6,027
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 3

Description

This event group covers a FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game between Tunisia and Nigeria scheduled for July 2, 2026 at 8:00 AM EDT. Markets on Polymarket and Kalshi are tracking the outcome of this single professional game, with resolution tied to the final score including overtime.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi's resolution criteria map both possible outcomes (Tunisia win and Nigeria win) to the same resolution state (Yes), creating a logical contradiction that makes the market fundamentally unresolvable and non-predictive.Hero tip: Do not trade Kalshi's version. The market cannot differentiate between the two possible game outcomes. Only Polymarket's binary structure (Tunisia vs Nigeria) is logically sound and tradeable.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Binary outcome resolution: Tunisia win resolves to Tunisia, Nigeria win resolves to Nigeria. Clear, mutually exclusive mapping. Includes postponement (market remains open) and cancellation (50-50 split) edge cases.
  • Kalshi: Logical contradiction: Both Tunisia win and Nigeria win resolve to Yes. No differentiation between outcomes. Creates unresolvable market state where all game results produce identical resolution.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

In the upcoming FIBA WCQ Africa game, scheduled for July 2 at 8:00AM ET: If the Tunisia win, the market will resolve to "Tunisia". If the Nigeria win, the market will resolve to "Nigeria". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50. The result will be determined based on the final score including any overtime periods.

Kalshi

Resolution is based on the final result of the Nigeria vs Tunisia professional FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game originally scheduled for July 2, 2026 at 8:00 AM EDT. If the game is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled game concludes, provided the reschedule occurs within two weeks. Should the game be cancelled and not played, or rescheduled beyond two weeks from the original date, the market resolves to a fair price for each team in accordance with established rules.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets and sportsbooks price outcomes differently because they operate under distinct incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance liability and extract margin, while prediction markets reflect pure trader belief—there is no house edge. Prediction market odds often incorporate real-time information faster than traditional sportsbooks update their lines. For this matchup, comparing this market's odds to major sportsbook spreads can reveal whether the crowd sees value the books have missed or mispriced.

Polymarket and Kalshi may quote different odds on the same event due to variations in user base, liquidity depth, and market microstructure. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts traders with different risk tolerances and information sets, so price discovery happens independently. Arbitrage traders often exploit these gaps, but friction costs and platform-specific rules can prevent instant convergence. Monitoring both venues helps you identify temporary mispricings and understand where the broader market truly stands.

Key catalysts include team news—injuries to star players, lineup changes, or tactical shifts announced before kickoff. Recent form, head-to-head records, and qualification implications can shift trader positioning significantly. Weather conditions and venue factors may also influence perceived advantage. Social media sentiment, expert analysis, and late-breaking injury reports often trigger sharp moves in the final hours. Monitor official team announcements and credible sports media for developments that could reshape market odds.