TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$113,466,932

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,423,222,590

402,751

Markets across

30,217

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,632

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Thiago Agustin Tirante vs Jacob Fearnley: Total Games
kalshi

Thiago Agustin Tirante vs Jacob Fearnley: Total Games

Volume:
$139

Over 23.5 games

 - Kalshi

Over 23.5 games - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 23, 2026

Closed: Jun 23, 10:07 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Over 23.5 games

View
47%
Yes 47¢No 53¢
100¢
N/A
$139
N/A
N/A
$139
Settled
No
kalshi

Over 18.5 games

N/A
N/A
100¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
kalshi

Over 28.5 games

N/A
N/A
100¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

This market tracks the total number of games played in the professional tennis match between Thiago Agustin Tirante and Jacob Fearnley at the 2026 ATP Eastbourne Round of 32 on June 22. Bettors can wager on whether the match will exceed various game thresholds.

Kalshi

Resolution is based on the total number of completed games in the full match. The match must be signaled by a ball being played to be considered as occurring; if it does not occur due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation before play begins, the market resolves to fair price. If the match is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled match concludes within two weeks. If a player retires, markets that can be unconditionally settled based on completed play resolve accordingly; those that cannot be unconditionally settled resolve to fair market price at the Exchange's discretion.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the Tirante vs Fearnley total games market displays real-time odds and price history as traders buy and sell shares based on their expectations for the match outcome. You can monitor how the probability shifts as new information emerges, track 24-hour trading volume to gauge market activity and liquidity, and observe historical price movements to understand how sentiment has evolved. This snapshot helps you assess current market consensus on the total number of games that will be played in this matchup.

Prediction market odds and traditional sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and manage risk, while prediction markets aggregate the beliefs of traders risking real capital on outcomes. This market aggregates trader conviction across the full range of possible game totals, which can reveal nuances that sportsbooks price differently. Comparing the two can highlight where the crowd sees value or where consensus differs from bookmaker expectations.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through a continuous order-book mechanism where traders submit bids and asks for shares tied to specific game-total outcomes. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each outcome reflects the balance between buyers and sellers at any given moment, with tighter spreads indicating higher confidence and liquidity. As match details, player form, or injury reports emerge, traders adjust their positions, moving prices to reflect updated expectations about how many games will be contested.

This market resolves around Jun 22, 2026, once the Tirante vs Fearnley match concludes and the total number of games is verified against credible public sources. The outcome is determined by the actual game count recorded in the official match result. Until that point, prices will fluctuate based on pre-match analysis, player news, and trader positioning. Resolution is automatic once the event is complete and the final tally is confirmed.

Several factors may shift prices before resolution. Injury announcements or changes to player availability can alter expectations about match duration and competitiveness. Betting patterns or public commentary from analysts may influence trader sentiment. Recent form, head-to-head history, or surface conditions could prompt reassessment of how competitive the contest will be. Court or venue changes, scheduling updates, or shifts in odds at major sportsbooks may also trigger repricing as traders incorporate new information into their forecasts.