TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$126,590,312

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,439,516,703

404,175

Markets across

30,277

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,685

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
The Hundred: MI London vs London Spirit - Team Top Batter
polymarket
kalshi

The Hundred: MI London vs London Spirit - Team Top Batter

Volume:
$3,754,848

MI London

 - Kalshi

MI London - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 29, 2026

Closed: Aug 2, 3:53 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

MI London

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$1,454,546
N/A
N/A
$595,546
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Manchester Super Giants

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$2,300,302
N/A
N/A
$1,132,075
Settled
No
polymarket

MI

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Draw

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

LON

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 5

Intro

This market tracks which team's player will score the highest individual runs in the The Hundred cricket match between MI London and Manchester Super Giants. The current aggregated consensus probability shows a 50.0% chance for Manchester Super Giants to win, with MI London also at 50.0%. Data is aggregated from Polymarket and Kalshi, resolving via ESPNCricinfo official match statistics. Watch the match on August 2, 2026, as it determines the outcome based on batting performance.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Unified Resolution Criteria (Consistent across platforms)

Both platforms resolve based on the same core metric: highest individual batting score by team, with identical handling of ties and match cancellation scenarios.Primary resolution logic: ESPNcricinfo official match statistics

Core resolution logic:

  • Resolve to MI London if a MI London player records the highest individual score alone
  • Resolve to London Spirit if a London Spirit player records the highest individual score alone
  • Resolve to Draw if highest score is shared between teams or no official statistics are recorded

Edge cases & clarifications:

  • Weather Cancellation: If the match is abandoned/canceled with no official batting statistics, the market resolves as Draw
  • Shared Top Score: If players from both teams tie for highest score, the market resolves as Draw regardless of match outcome
Timing: Resolves once official batting statistics are published by ESPNcricinfo following the completed matchOur PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to which team's player records the highest individual run total in the cricket match between MI London and London Spirit scheduled for 2026-07-29 in The Hundred. This market resolves according to the finalized match statistics as published by https://www.espncricinfo.com/. The outcome corresponding to MI London will be considered correct if the highest individual score in the match is recorded exclusively by a player from MI London. The outcome corresponding to London Spirit will be considered correct if the highest individual score is recorded exclusively by a player from London Spirit. If the highest individual score is shared by at least one player from each team, the market will resolve to Draw. The market will resolve according to which team's player records the highest individual run total regardless of if the match is not competed (e.g. Due to weather conditions). DLS/DRS adjustments and any other on-field rulings affecting batting statistics are treated as ordinary data. If the match is permanently canceled, abandoned, or otherwise completed without official batting statistics being recorded, the market will resolve Draw. If the match is postponed or rescheduled, the market remains open until the listed fixture is completed and official statistics are available.

Kalshi

The market resolves to Yes if the specified team wins the match. If the match ends in a tie, draw, no result, abandonment, cancellation, or insufficient play to determine a winner, all markets resolve to $0.50. If a forfeit, disqualification, or concession occurs before the match begins, all markets resolve to $0.50. If it occurs after the match begins and the governing body declares an official winner, the market resolves based on that result.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket and Kalshi, the Hundred Top Batter market dashboard aggregates real-time probabilities and volume across platforms, showing how traders view the likely top run-scorer in this cricket fixture. It tracks the consensus view and liquidity for this market, with current volume at $3,754,848. The dashboard updates continuously, reflecting shifts in trader sentiment as the match approaches.

On Polymarket, this market reflects trader sentiment through dynamic pricing, often showing sharper divergences than traditional sportsbook lines. Prediction markets incorporate real-time information flow and can price in nuanced scenarios that sportsbooks may simplify. The gap between these odds and sportsbook odds typically hinges on liquidity differences and how each market aggregates participant insights. With volume at $3,754,848, prediction markets may react faster to breaking news, creating potential mispricings relative to slower sportsbook adjustments. This difference allows traders to exploit gaps when public betting trends skew sportsbook lines away from pure probability estimates.