TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$103,397,351

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,410,176,180

399,592

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,622

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Tala'ea El Gaish SC vs. Smouha SC
polymarket
kalshi

What is the result of Tala'ea El Gaish SC vs. Smouha SC?

Volume:
$584,978

Smouha

all

2 markets

Kalshi

Polymarket

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Sep 14, 2026

Closed: Sep 14, 12:33 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Smouha

View
100%
74%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$140,397
N/A
N/A
$73,853
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Smouha SC

View
100%
74%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$21,287
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

El Gaish

View
0%
35%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$267,180
N/A
N/A
$185,904
Settled
No
polymarket

Tala'ea El Gaish SC

View
0%
34%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$46,679
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
kalshi

Tie

View
0%
39%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$95,339
N/A
N/A
$56,979
Settled
No
polymarket

Draw (Tala'ea El Gaish SC vs. Smouha SC)

View
0%
39%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$14,096
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 6

Intro

This market tracks whether Smouha SC will win their soccer match against Tala'ea El Gaish SC on September 14, 2026. Currently, the consensus probability of Smouha SC winning is 100.0%, as aggregated from Polymarket and Kalshi. The resolution source for this market is the official website of the Egyptian Football Association, https://www.efa.com.eg/. Keep an eye on the official kickoff time and result reporting following the match on September 14, 2026, to see how this market resolves.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Cancellation handling differs between platforms. Polymarket resolves canceled games to 'No', while Kalshi lacks explicit cancellation rules.Hero tip: Consider the risk of a canceled match. Polymarket offers defined resolution, while Kalshi could leave markets open indefinitely.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Resolves to 'No' if the game is canceled entirely with no make-up game. Uses official statistics, then Flashscore/Sofascore if official data is delayed. Key Quote: "If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 'No'."
  • Kalshi: Resolves based on the result after 90 minutes plus stoppage time. No explicit cancellation handling is stated. Key Quote: "If Tie is the result...then the market resolves to Yes."
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This event is for the upcoming Egypt Egyptian Premier League game, scheduled for Monday, September 14, 2026 between Tala'ea El Gaish SC and Smouha SC.

Kalshi

The event resolves based on the result of the El Gaish vs Smouha professional Egyptian Premier League soccer match scheduled for September 14, 2026, after 90 minutes plus stoppage time. Three distinct markets correspond to the possible outcomes: El Gaish win, Smouha win, or a tie. If the match concludes with a victory for either El Gaish or Smouha within regular time, the respective market resolves to Yes. If the game ends in a tie after regular time, the Tie market resolves to Yes. In the event the match is cancelled or rescheduled to more than 48 hours beyond the original date, all markets will resolve to a fair price as determined by the platform rules. The resolution specifically excludes extra time and penalty shootouts, focusing solely on the result after standard playing time.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket and Kalshi, this dashboard tracks the consensus view on the outcome of the Egyptian Premier League match. Currently, the aggregated volume across both platforms is $584,978, with $536,733 traded in the last 24 hours. The current market indicates a probability distribution across possible outcomes, reflecting traders’ beliefs about which team will win, or if the match will end in a draw. This allows for a real-time assessment of expectations surrounding the Tala'ea El Gaish SC versus Smouha SC contest, providing a unique perspective beyond traditional betting odds.

Prediction market odds, as seen on Polymarket and Kalshi, often differ from traditional sportsbook odds due to the differing incentives and information sources of participants. Sportsbooks primarily aim to balance their books and profit from margins, while prediction market participants are incentivized to accurately forecast the outcome. This can lead to prediction markets incorporating a wider range of information, including potentially non-public data or nuanced analysis. While both aim to reflect probabilities, the mechanisms and participant motivations create distinct pricing dynamics for this market.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Prices on Polymarket and Kalshi may diverge due to several factors. These platforms have different user bases, trading volumes, and market-making activity, all influencing price discovery. Additionally, each platform may interpret and implement market rules slightly differently, impacting how traders assess risk and opportunity. Currently, Polymarket currently favors a win for El Gaish, while Kalshi leans toward a draw. These differing perspectives, combined with platform-specific dynamics, contribute to the observed price discrepancies in this market.