TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
T20 Blast: Sussex vs Essex
polymarket
kalshi

What is the result of Sussex vs Essex?

Volume:
$119,681

Essex

 - Kalshi

Essex - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 3, 2026

Closed: Jul 3, 4:50 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Essex

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$51,653
N/A
N/A
$39,114
Settled
Yes
polymarket

T20 Blast: Sussex vs Essex - Completed match?

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$143
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Sussex

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$52,882
N/A
N/A
$29,672
Settled
No
polymarket

T20 Blast: Sussex vs Essex

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$14,821
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

T20 Blast: Sussex vs Essex - Who wins the toss?

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$183
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 5

Description

This event group covers three related prediction markets for the T20 Blast cricket match between Sussex and Essex scheduled for July 3, 2026: whether the match is completed, who wins the match, and who wins the pre-match coin toss. All markets reference the official result as published by ESPNcricinfo.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Polymarket provides exhaustive edge-case logic for match outcomes (ties, Super Overs, cancellations, abandonment), while Kalshi's resolution criteria are incomplete and do not address tied matches, abandonment, or cancellation scenarios.Hero tip: Polymarket traders benefit from explicit tie-resolution rules (Super Over winner or 50-50 for group-stage draws). Kalshi traders should seek clarification on how the market resolves if the match is abandoned, canceled, or ends in a tie without a Super Over, as the published logic does not cover these scenarios.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Comprehensive match-winner logic: DLS/DRS and on-field rulings count as ordinary wins. Tied matches with Super Over tiebreaks resolve to the tiebreak winner. Tied matches without tiebreaks (e.g., group-stage) resolve 50-50. Postponed matches remain open until played. Abandoned, canceled, or no-result matches resolve 50-50. Key Quote: 'If the match ends tied and the playing conditions provide an on-field tiebreak (e.g., Super Over), the winner determined by that tiebreak will be used for resolution. If the match ends tied and no on-field tiebreak is used or available...the market will resolve 50-50.'
  • Kalshi: Minimal match-winner logic: Yes resolves if Sussex or Essex wins. No explicit handling of ties, abandonment, cancellation, or no-result scenarios. The logic does not state what happens if the match is abandoned or ends in a tie. Key Quote: 'If Sussex wins the Sussex vs Essex men's professional T20 Blast (M) cricket match originally scheduled for Jul 3, 2026 at 2:00 PM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes. If Essex wins...then the market resolves to Yes.'
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the cricket match between Sussex and Essex scheduled for July 3 2026 in T20 Blast. This market resolves according to the finalized match result as published by https://www.espncricinfo.com/. DLS/DRS, over-rate penalties, forfeit/walkover, or any other on-field ruling that leads the competition to declare a winner are treated as ordinary wins. If the match ends tied and the playing conditions provide an on-field tiebreak (e.g., Super Over), the winner determined by that tiebreak will be used for resolution. If the match ends tied and no on-field tiebreak is used or available under the playing conditions (e.g., group-stage ODI with no Super Over), the market will resolve 50-50. If the match is postponed/rescheduled, the market remains open until the listed fixture is completed. If the match is permanently canceled or abandoned or otherwise is completed without a winner, the market resolves 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.

Kalshi

Resolution depends on an official winner being declared by the governing body. If the match concludes with a decisive result, the winning team resolves to Yes. Ties, draws, no results, abandonments, or cancellations without an official winner all resolve to $0.50. Forfeits, disqualifications, or concessions occurring before play begins also resolve to $0.50; if they occur after play has begun and an official winner is declared, that result determines resolution. If play commences but insufficient play occurs to establish an official result, all markets resolve to $0.50.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price events differently because they operate on distinct mechanisms. Sportsbooks set odds to balance liability and extract a margin, while prediction markets like those tracked here reflect live trader consensus without a built-in house edge. This often means prediction market prices respond faster to new information and can diverge meaningfully from sportsbook lines, especially as match day approaches. Comparing the two can reveal value opportunities, though prediction markets typically carry wider spreads and lower liquidity than major betting venues.

Polymarket and Kalshi may price this market differently due to variations in user base, liquidity depth, and settlement rule interpretation. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts traders with different risk tolerances and information sets, so order flow and conviction can shift the odds independently. Additionally, if the platforms define outcomes or resolution timing slightly differently, arbitrage friction and withdrawal delays can prevent prices from converging fully. Monitoring both venues helps you identify which platform offers better value for your view.